Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-11-03
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The bar chart shows the typical weekday for students in three different countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
The graph illustrates the typical weekday for students in three different countries i.e. UK, Japan and Germany.
Overall, the graph explains the information about sleeping, studying and relaxing hours of students in three different countries as mentioned above.
Firstly, in UK students sleep 8.5 hours in a weekday, while, on the other hand students in Japan sleep 7 hours. on contrary to both, students in Germany sleep 8 hours in a random weekday.
Secondly, the students in UK study 8 hours in a weekday. On the other hand, in Japan, the students study 13 hours a day. While, on contrary to both, students in Germany study 9 hours in a day.
Finally, the pupils of UK relax 7 hours a day. On the other side, the pupils of Japan relax 4 hours in a weekday. However the children of Germany relax 7 hours a day just like children of UK.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 4.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5
You report all nine figures accurately and cover sleeping, studying and relaxing in each country, so the reader can identify the chart’s basic information. However, the overview only says what categories are shown; it does not highlight the main comparisons, such as Japan having the longest study time and shortest relaxation time, or the broadly similar relaxation figures for the UK and Germany. The response is also below the required 150 words: 141 words, with the nine words copied from the prompt excluded. This shortfall contributes to the limited development. Add a concise overview of the key contrasts and explain the most notable patterns rather than presenting the figures only as separate facts.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and three paragraphs introduced by “Firstly,” “Secondly,” and “Finally.” This makes the categories easy to follow, and the information is generally presented in a sensible order. However, the progression is mechanical, with each paragraph repeating a similar country-by-country pattern. Linking phrases such as “On the other hand” and “on contrary to both” are overused or awkward, and the overview does not guide the reader towards the most important comparisons. Group related figures more purposefully—for example, compare Japan’s study and relaxation hours together—and use fewer, more natural transitions to improve flow.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
Your vocabulary is sufficient to communicate the chart’s basic content, using relevant terms such as “sleep,” “study,” “relax,” and “hours.” However, the range is limited and several expressions are repetitive or unsuitable for describing data. “The graph explains the information” is imprecise, while “random weekday” does not convey the intended meaning. Repeated phrases such as “students in a weekday” and “on the other hand” also make the writing sound less natural. Use more precise chart language, including “shows,” “spend,” “recorded,” and “compared with.” This would make the report clearer and more appropriately formal without requiring unnecessarily complex vocabulary.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
You use some simple and compound sentence forms, and the main figures remain understandable. However, the range is limited, and errors recur in sentence construction, punctuation, and article use. For example, “in UK students sleep” needs an article and clearer punctuation, while “on contrary to both” is not formed correctly. The sentence beginning “While, on contrary to both” is also an incomplete or awkwardly attached clause. Capitalisation is inconsistent after full stops, as in “on contrary.” Practise accurate comparison structures such as “In the UK, students sleep for…” and “Germany’s figure is similar.” More controlled sentence patterns would reduce errors and make comparisons easier to read.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
