Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Smoking can cause serious illnesses and should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

It is widely said that smocking should be made illegal as it causes serious health issues. I strongly agree with this statement beacuse it is a major reason for respiratory and cardiovascular issues and makes a person addicted to it on a level that he cannot function properly without it.

From a smokers perspective it is an escape from its usual hectic routine. Others smoke just to fit in their society and to adapt it as fashion. This habit is highly influenced by person's company that can promote it as a soothing experience or a modern lifestyle. Smoking evidently affects person's day-to-day life because carcinogens in the smoke causes respiratory alveoli to collapse and reduce the ability of the lungs to expand. This ultimately results in 'smoker's cough' disease that can easily be distinguished from a normal cough.

Moreover, the first physiological system that gets damaged by the toxic smoke is the cardiovascular system beacuse it causes arteries to harden and rupture easily. Smoking not only do physical damage but also imparts psychological damage. Addicts cannot carry out their daily activities without smoking and often show aggressive behaviour. That is the reason that some workplaces have allowed smoking-on-site but it puts non-smokers on a higher risk of smoke-related illness because of passive smoking which is 10 times as harmful than active smoking. Therefore, smoking should be made illegal at all public places due to its disruptive effects on the addict as well as people around it.

In conclusion, smoking should be made illegal as it causes serious illness. I favour this point of view because smoking causes physiologocal and psychological damage to the addict and also puts people around it on a greater health risk. This policy should be implemented at all public places.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource6.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction: you strongly agree that smoking should be illegal, and the conclusion restates this view. You give relevant reasons, including respiratory and cardiovascular harm, addiction, and risks to non-smokers. These points address the task, and the health effects provide a useful basis for your argument. However, the response does not fully develop the scope of the proposal. The body mainly discusses harms and ends by advocating a ban in public places, which is narrower than making smoking illegal altogether. The points about social influence and workplace behaviour are also asserted rather than explained with specific support. Clarify whether you support a complete prohibition or restrictions in public spaces, then develop that position consistently with a concrete example or explanation.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs, and a conclusion. The progression from reasons people smoke to physical and psychological consequences is generally logical, and signposts such as “Moreover” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the argument. This gives the essay a coherent overall arrangement. Some connections, however, are abrupt or unclear. For example, the sentence about workplaces allowing on-site smoking does not clearly explain how this supports the preceding point about addiction, and “Therefore” leads to a ban in public places even though the introduction argues for making smoking illegal. Referencing is also occasionally vague, as in “around it.” Make the relationship between each example and your main claim explicit, and use transitions that reflect the precise scope of your argument.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.5

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “respiratory,” “cardiovascular,” “carcinogens,” “addicts,” and “passive smoking.” These terms help communicate the health-related argument, and you attempt less common language such as “physiological system” and “disruptive effects.” Some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward, though: “smocking” and “beacuse” are misspelled, “adapt it as fashion” is unnatural, and “on a higher risk” does not express the intended meaning idiomatically. “Smoker’s cough disease” is also an imprecise label. These slips do not prevent understanding, but they limit precision and naturalness. Check spelling carefully and learn common collocations in context, especially when describing causes, risks, and social influences.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including clauses introduced by “because,” “that,” and “which.” Several sentences communicate detailed ideas clearly, such as the explanation that smoke can damage the lungs and reduce their ability to expand. Some grammatical errors remain, although the overall meaning is usually clear. For example, “carcinogens in the smoke causes” has a subject–verb agreement error, while “Smoking not only do physical damage” has an incorrect verb form and structure. Articles and possessives are also sometimes missing, as in “from a smokers perspective” and “because of person's company.” Review agreement, article use, and parallel constructions, and proofread longer sentences to ensure that each clause is grammatically complete.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.