Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-02

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Smoking can cause serious illnesses and should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

Smoking is injurious for health. It causes several dangerous diseases such as, heart attack, cancer, liver damage and so on. Governments should take proper steps to stop the supply of this unusual products. I strongly agree with this viewpoint.

To start with, taking different poisonous items for example, cigarrete, yaba, gaja etc are detrimental for human body but many youngsters take those poisons as a chocolate. They are addicted in this things which creates different serious issues in their lungs. In addition, though it is harmful for people's body; youth still take it easy and they take those any bachelor party and enjoy with their peers. For instance, in Europe America, almost all adults drinks everyday even though women are not concious about this. As a result, they may faces some unpleasant illnesses.

Furthermore, it is not only responsibility of their guardians but also governments to take proper steps about this harmful situations. Besides that, reducing supply of this poisons from another countries is must. Despite so many rules in schools, colleges, their should be add some more regulations about youngers. For example, growing numbers of individuals are careful about their health but still they bring smoke just because there are no any kind of illigelacy. As a consequences, authorities can overcome this phenomenon.

To sum up, the more we are aware about smoking the more easily we can reduce this circumstances. Finally, it would be more beneficial for generation to engage with social sites and maintain national rules so that this problem will be demolish.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response addresses the task partially by presenting a clear position that smoking should be made illegal, supported by examples such as health risks and the behavior of youngsters. However, the development of ideas remains limited and under-developed throughout the essay. While the writer touches on several relevant concepts, such as the social aspects of smoking and the need for stricter government regulations, these points lack thorough elaboration and logical extension. For instance, the mention of Europe and America or the reference to different substances like 'yaba' and 'gaja' are introduced without adequate contextual connection to the core argument. To move to a higher level, the writer needs to ensure that every main idea is fully explored with detailed explanations and well-focused supporting evidence rather than relying on brief, disconnected assertions.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The essay displays some organisation with paragraphing used to separate distinct stages of the argument, such as the introduction of health issues, the discussion on youth behaviour, and the call for regulatory action. Nevertheless, there is a lack of clear overall progression, and the logical flow between sentences and paragraphs is frequently disrupted. Cohesive devices are sometimes used inaccurately or mechanically, as seen in transitions like 'In addition, though it is harmful for people's body; youth still take it easy' and 'Besides that, reducing supply of this poisons from another countries is must.' Furthermore, referencing is not always clear, making it difficult for the reader to track the relationship between ideas. Enhancing the variety and precision of transitional markers, as well as ensuring a smoother logical progression from one point to the next, would significantly improve the overall cohesion of the writing.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

The vocabulary used is limited and minimally adequate for addressing the prompt, featuring frequent errors in word choice, collocation, and word formation. Examples of noticeable lexical issues include 'injurious for health' instead of 'injurious to health', 'unusual products' instead of 'harmful products', and the awkward phrase 'bring smoke just because there are no any kind of illigelacy.' The writer attempts some less common vocabulary, such as 'detrimental' and 'phenomenon', but these attempts are often marred by imprecise usage or awkward phrasing. Spelling and word-form inaccuracies, such as 'concious' instead of 'conscious' and 'demolish' instead of 'demolished', occasionally cause difficulty for the reader. To achieve a stronger score, the writer must expand their lexical range and pay closer attention to natural collocations and word forms appropriate for academic contexts.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response demonstrates a very limited range of grammatical structures, relying mostly on simple sentences alongside attempts at complex forms that are frequently faulty. Frequent errors in grammar and punctuation can cause difficulty for the reader and obscure meaning. Issues are evident in subject-verb agreement and singular/plural usage, such as 'this unusual products', 'they may faces', and 'their should be add some more regulations about youngers.' Prepositional patterns and article usage are also problematic, as seen in phrases like 'take those any bachelor party' and 'responsibility of their guardians.' To progress, the writer needs to increase the variety of error-free complex sentences, paying careful attention to verb tenses, modal structures, and basic grammatical agreements.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.