Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-15

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Smoking can cause serious illnesses and should be made illegal.

To what extent do you agree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The prevelance of smoking is a subject of ongoing debate in the world. Scientifically, it is thought that adverse effect it can cause is a non-refutable; therefore, it should be considered as an unlawfuil activity. I totally agree with this viewpoint since it can cause life-threating deseases and may exert a deleterious impact on the human psychology.

To begin with, some uncurable diseases may stem from the smoking. This manifets itself in the widespread of lung cancer. World Health Organization often raise awareness about how it may propel the negative things ingrained in the body which can directly affect the lung cancer. A study conducted in the UK revaled that individuals appear to be suffered from this dangerous illness more compared to others who are not engaged in smoking.Thus, it can be beneficial to make it illegal to be assured about the well-being of society in the long.

Another compelling reason for justying this sort of approach is its possible effect on human behaviour. Unquestionably, it encompasses some harmful toxins, nicotins - substances are proved to trigger the neurons related to nerve system in human's brain. This harmful elements may negatively contribute to the abnormal states of conditions. To put it another way, individuals, who are chain smokers , demonstrates some unacceptible aggresions in the society due to its effect on the brain. If they did not smoke, they would not be so aggresive.

In conclusion, smoking should be regarded as an illegal act in society for the sake of protecting health and psychology.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear from the introduction: “I totally agree,” and the conclusion returns to the view that smoking should be illegal. You give two relevant reasons—physical illness and possible effects on behaviour—and include a reference to a UK study, so the response addresses the task. However, the support is uneven. The lung-cancer point is relevant, but the explanation of how smoking causes it is vague, and the study is not described in enough detail to make the example persuasive. The claim that smokers show “unacceptable aggressions” is also broad and insufficiently supported. Develop each reason with a clearer explanation and a specific, credible example to make the argument more convincing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two body paragraphs presenting separate reasons, and a conclusion. Signposts such as “To begin with,” “Another compelling reason,” and “In conclusion” help readers follow the overall progression. However, some connections between ideas are mechanical or unclear. For example, the move from toxins to “abnormal states of conditions” and then to aggression does not explain the relationship between these claims. The reference to the UK study also appears abruptly, without enough context. Use linking language to show cause and effect more precisely, and make sure each paragraph develops one central point in a logical sequence. Clearer referencing would also help readers understand what “it” refers to.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You attempt a range of topic-related and less common vocabulary, including “deleterious impact,” “widespread,” “toxins,” and “trigger the neurons.” This gives the response some variety and generally keeps the topic clear. However, several choices are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “non-refutable,” “uncurable diseases,” “the negative things ingrained in the body,” and “abnormal states of conditions.” Spelling errors—including “prevelance,” “unlawfuil,” and “aggresions”—also reduce accuracy. Aim for precise, natural collocations rather than choosing complex-sounding phrases: for instance, explain that smoking increases the risk of lung cancer instead of using vague wording about negative effects. Proofreading spelling and word forms will make your argument more credible.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use a mix of simple and complex forms, including a conditional sentence (“If they did not smoke, they would not be so aggressive”) and clauses introduced by “since” and “who.” The main ideas are usually understandable, but some grammatical errors remain. In “adverse effect it can cause,” a determiner is needed, while “World Health Organization often raise awareness” has an agreement problem and needs an article. The construction “individuals appear to be suffered” is also faulty; use “appear to suffer” or “appear to have suffered.” In “nicotins - substances are proved,” the relationship between the noun and its explanation needs a grammatical link. Review articles, subject–verb agreement, and clause construction, and check punctuation around inserted explanations.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.