Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-11-05

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The line graph illustrates the number of tourist that visited frist time and those who returned from Caryl Island over a period of eight-year, from 2000 to 2008.

It is clear seen that the number of returning visitors fluctuated and showed a upward trend throughout the period. While the tourists who had first time, they dipped at the start of the period, however they experienced a steady rise.

In detail, returning tourists started at around 3,000 in 2000 and surged to 10,000 followed by next two years. By the next two years the proportion of holiday-makers increased gradually, in addition, the figure peaked at 15,000 before it declined at the end of the period.

The number of visitors who went first time, at the begining it accounts more tourists as compared to other, nevertheless, it dipped to 4000 while started at 8000 in 2000. This figure experienced consistent increase and reached at just under 12000 in 2008.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response6.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.5
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You identify the overall contrast between the series: returning visitors rose substantially before falling, while first-time visitors dipped and then recovered. The figures are generally well selected, including the starting values, the low of 4,000, and the final figure of just under 12,000. However, the overview is not fully accurate: returning visitors did not show an upward trend throughout, since they declined from about 15,200 in 2006 to 13,400 in 2008. The comparison that first-time visitors initially outnumbered returning visitors is also reversed; the latter were higher in 2000. These inaccuracies and the limited comparison of the two series keep the report from presenting the main features consistently and precisely.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall arrangement, moving from an introduction and overview to separate details about returning and first-time visitors. This makes the main information easy to locate. You also use linking expressions such as “While,” “however,” and “In detail” to signal relationships. At times, though, the connections are mechanical or unclear. For example, “surged to 10,000 followed by next two years” does not clearly express the time sequence, and “By the next two years” is an awkward transition. The final paragraph begins with a confusing comparison before correcting itself. Use more direct chronological links and ensure each paragraph develops one clear point.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary for describing trends, including “surged,” “dipped,” “steady rise,” and “peaked,” and the reader can generally understand the intended meaning. There are also some inaccurate or unnatural choices: “the proportion of holiday-makers” is not appropriate for visitor numbers, and “tourists who had first time” is an awkward way to identify this group. Spelling errors such as “frist” and “begining” also reduce accuracy. Aim for precise, consistent terms such as “number of visitors” and “first-time visitors,” and choose trend verbs that match the data. This would make the description more natural and exact.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and more complex structures, including a contrast with “While” and clauses linked by “however.” Meaning is usually recoverable, but some grammatical errors affect clarity. For instance, “It is clear seen” has an incorrect construction, and “they dipped at the start … however they experienced” needs clearer clause punctuation and structure. In “The number of visitors who went first time, at the begining it accounts,” the sentence has a faulty opening and shifts tense from past to present. There are also errors in articles and number agreement, as in “a upward trend” and “number of tourist.” Practise forming complete clauses and maintaining past tense when reporting historical data.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.