Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-11-10

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The two line grph diclineate the number of first time visitors and returning visitors whi visited caryl island from 2000 to 2008

Overall, It can clearly be seen that returning visitors were had the dramatical increas iver the period while, firt time visitos at the bigining of the period had a fell drop and this prortion rose to 12000 at the end.

In 2000 approximately 8000 visitors visit caryl island while, the number of returning visitors

much lower at 3000.However the fugure was for returning visitors increase to 10000 in 2002. Whereas,number if first time visitors fell down to 4000 in 2002 Again the proportion increase to 6000 in 2004 returning visitors stood at 12000 in 2004 respectively

By 2006 returning visitors peaked at 15000 compared with first time visitors accounted for 10000 in the same year. In contrast, first time visitors remaind 11900 in 2008 comparison returning visitor they had a dramatical drop reach 13300 in 2008 respectively.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You cover both visitor groups and give a relevant overview: returning visitors rose overall, while first-time visitors fell initially and then recovered. Several key figures are reported accurately, including the 2000 starting values and the 2002 and 2004 figures. However, the overview is not fully precise: returning visitors did not increase throughout, as they fell from about 15,200 in 2006 to 13,400 in 2008, and first-time visitors ended at about 11,800 rather than 12,000. The 2006 first-time figure is also closer to 9,300 than 10,000. These comparisons are useful, but clearer, more accurate reporting of the final movements would make the account more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure, moving from an introduction and overview to chronological details, and the years help the reader follow the data. However, progression within the detail paragraph is sometimes difficult to track because several comparisons are joined in long, loosely punctuated sentences. For example, the sentence beginning “Again the proportion increase to 6000 in 2004” moves directly into the returning-visitors figure without a clear boundary. Connectors such as “However,” “Whereas,” and “In contrast” are attempted, but some are awkwardly placed or do not clearly signal the relationship between the figures. Use separate sentences or grouped comparisons, and make references such as “the figure” explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “visitors,” “peaked,” “compared with,” and “drop,” so the main trends can generally be understood. However, the range is limited and several word-choice, form, and spelling errors make the description less clear or natural. Examples include “dramatical increas,” “fell drop,” and “this proportion rose,” where “proportion” does not accurately describe the number of visitors. There are also repeated misspellings, such as “diclineate,” “firt,” and “remaind.” Aim for precise trend language and check spelling carefully; using a small range of accurate verbs such as “declined,” “recovered,” “climbed,” and “fell” would improve clarity.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentence forms, including comparisons introduced by “while” and “whereas.” However, control is inconsistent, and errors in verb forms, sentence construction, articles, and punctuation sometimes make relationships between figures hard to follow. For instance, “returning visitors were had the dramatical increas” combines incompatible verb forms, while “the number of returning visitors much lower at 3000” lacks a finite verb. In “the figure was for returning visitors increase to 10000,” the verb pattern is also faulty. Build sentences around a clear subject and verb, and check tense consistency when describing past data. Full stops and commas should separate comparisons rather than leaving them run together.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.