Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-11-13

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The line graph depicts the number of people visiting the Caryl Island for the first time and the returning one between 2000 to 2008.

Overall, there is a sharp rise in numbers of returning individuals at after peaking to a certain level it decreased. While first time visitors initially declined and rose rapidly after a short period of time.

The number of people who visited the Island first time reduced to a half from 8000 in 2000 to 4000 in a short period of two years(2000). After that a considerable rise in the amount of tourists reached upto 12000 can be seen in the consecutive years.

On the other hand, returning tourists showed more interest and their values gone sharply to a significant level from 3000 in the year 2000 to 10000 right after two years. Then from 2002 to 2006 a gradual increase can be seen reached to 14000 and a sudden fall to approximately 13000 in the year 2008.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You cover both visitor groups and identify the main broad patterns: returning visitors rose to a peak before falling, while first-time visitors fell initially and then recovered. Several figures are also reported accurately, including the starting values and the returning total of about 10,000 in 2002. However, some details are unclear or inaccurate: first-time visitors reached about 11,800 in 2008, not 12,000 in the “consecutive years” after 2002, and returning visitors peaked at about 15,200 in 2006 rather than 14,000. The overview also says returning numbers decreased after peaking but does not clearly state that they remained higher than first-time visitors throughout. More precise comparisons and a clearer account of the first-time series’ final rise would make the summary more complete.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for the two visitor groups. This gives the reader a coherent overall route through the information, and transitions such as “Overall” and “On the other hand” help signal the organisation. However, the progression within some sentences is difficult to follow. For example, “at after peaking to a certain level it decreased” combines ideas awkwardly, while “Then from 2002 to 2006 a gradual increase can be seen reached to 14000” lacks a clear grammatical link between the trend and its endpoint. The first-time visitor paragraph also omits the final year. Use clearer sentence boundaries and connect each trend directly to its dates and values.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of task-related vocabulary, including “sharp rise,” “declined,” “considerable rise,” “peaking,” and “sudden fall.” These choices help communicate the broad movements, and the meaning is generally understandable. Some less common or formal expressions are attempted, but several are inaccurate or unnatural: “returning individuals,” “showed more interest,” and “their values gone sharply” do not describe visitor numbers precisely. “Reached upto” is also an unsuitable form in this context. Prefer standard chart language such as “the number of returning visitors increased,” “rose to,” and “fell to.” More precise vocabulary would also help distinguish a peak from a general high point and avoid describing numerical changes as changes in visitors’ interest.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and more complex forms, including contrast clauses with “While” and time-linked sentences beginning “After that” and “Then.” The main trends can usually be understood, but some grammatical errors affect clarity. In the overview, “there is a sharp rise … at after peaking … it decreased” has a faulty clause structure and inconsistent tense. Other examples include “the number … reduced to a half,” “their values gone sharply,” and “a gradual increase can be seen reached to 14000,” where verb forms and sentence construction are not controlled. Articles and prepositions also need attention, as in “the Caryl Island” and “between 2000 to 2008.” Practise forming complete clauses with consistent past tense, for example, “Returning visitors rose to a peak in 2006 before falling.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.