Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-09-04

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

here is the detailed explanation of the given graph.this graph shows the comparison between two types of visitors that visit caryl island from 2000 to 2008,it shows comparison of about 8 years how the number changes with period of time .the blue line shows number of visitors who visited for the first time while the red line shows the number of returning visitors .On x axis years are listed from 2000 to 2008,where as on Y axis number of users are listed ,this graph shows different trends overtime lets discuss it.in 2000 around 8000 peoples are first time visitor and 3000 visitors are returning visitors,when we move to 2002 we see significant change first time visitors falls to 4000 peoples while returning visitors increases upto 10000 people,as we move ahead we see in 2004 we see number of first time visit people increases slightly to 6000 along with increase in returning visitors to 12000,as we can see in 2006 the returning visitors achieve all time highest number which is 15000 and first time visitors reaches 10000,but in 2008 first time visitors follows upside trend where as returning visitors number begun to fall due to some reasons.

In conclusion in begining first time visitors number falls where as returning visitors number increases but later with time first time visitors number also increases upto 12000 to reach all time highest value ,first time visitors lowest value is 4000 and highest value is 12000,where as returning visitors lowest value is 3000 and the peak highest number it achived is 15000

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.5

You have successfully identified the main trends and provided data points to support your description. You covered both visitor categories across the specified timeframe. However, the response lacks a clear, professional structure. The introduction is informal, and the overview is embedded within the body paragraphs rather than being a distinct summary of the main features. To reach a higher band, ensure you provide a clear overview of the overall trends (e.g., the general upward trajectory for both groups) immediately after the introduction. While you included specific data, the analysis could be more concise to avoid repetitive phrasing.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 5.5

The response is coherent in its overall arrangement, but the use of cohesive devices is mechanical and repetitive. You rely heavily on commas to join independent clauses, which creates run-on sentences and makes the flow feel disjointed. There is a lack of sophisticated linking words or transition signals (e.g., 'subsequently', 'in contrast', 'meanwhile'). Paragraphing is present, but the transition between the body and the conclusion is abrupt. Improving your use of cohesive devices and varying your sentence structure will significantly enhance the logical progression of your writing.

Lexical Resource — Band 5.5

Your vocabulary is adequate for the task but remains quite basic. You frequently use repetitive phrases like 'number of' and 'visitors'. There are also some inaccuracies in word choice, such as 'peoples' (which should be 'people') and 'upside trend' (which is not standard academic terminology). To improve, try to incorporate more precise reporting verbs and nouns, such as 'fluctuated', 'peaked', 'downturn', or 'significant growth'. You should also focus on avoiding informal phrasing like 'lets discuss it' and 'due to some reasons', which are not appropriate for an Academic Task 1 report.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5

The response contains a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there are frequent errors in punctuation and grammar. You consistently use commas where full stops are required, leading to run-on sentences. There are also errors in subject-verb agreement (e.g., 'first time visitors follows') and pluralization (e.g., 'peoples'). While these errors do not completely impede communication, they are frequent enough to distract the reader. Focusing on sentence boundaries and ensuring consistent verb tense usage—specifically using the past tense for data from 2000 to 2008—will help improve your accuracy.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.