Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-09-25
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
The line graph illustrates the number of first time tourists and returning tourist who visited Caryl island between 2000 and 2008.
Overall, the first time visitors decreased rapidly in [redacted phone] and after that, it increased significantly till 2008. Returning visitors rose up till 2006 and decreased slightly until 2008.
First of all, In 2000, population of new visitors were 8000, but it went down till 4000 visitors in 2002. Moreover, it grew steadily to 6000 newcomers in 2004, after that, population peaked at 12000 visitors in between [redacted phone].
Secondly, In 2000, returning visitors accounted for 3000, followed by it increased to 10000 travellers in 2002. Additionally, In 2004 and 2006, numbers were 12000 and 15000 respectively. Furthermore, it slightly declined to 13000 people in 2008.
To sum up, first-time visitors fluctuated considerably, whereas returning visitors increased steadily until 2006 before experiencing a slight decline in the final two years of the period.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
The student covers all key features of the line graph and makes relevant comparisons between first-time and returning visitors throughout the period. An overview is provided, noting the main trends such as the fluctuations in first-time visitors and the general rise of returning visitors until 2006. However, there are some inaccuracies in data reporting; for example, the summary states that first-time visitors 'peaked at 12000 visitors in between 2004-2008', whereas the graph shows them reaching around 11800 in 2008 following a continuous rise from 2004, and there are some contradictions between the body paragraphs and the conclusion regarding the overall trajectory of first-time visitors. Despite these minor data reading flaws, the main trends are adequately captured, earning a solid Band 6.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response is organized into logical paragraphs, including an introduction, an overview, separate body paragraphs for each category of visitor, and a concluding summary. Cohesive devices are employed to signal transitions, such as 'Overall', 'First of all', 'Secondly', and 'To sum up'. However, some cohesive links and referencing feel slightly mechanical or repetitive, such as 'Furthermore' and 'Additionally'. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate ideas, but the logical progression within sentences is occasionally hindered by awkward phrasing. Overall, the essay is coherent and easy to follow, fitting the descriptors for Band 6.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.5
The student demonstrates an adequate vocabulary range for the task, using appropriate terms related to data trends such as 'decreased rapidly', 'increased significantly', 'peaked', and 'declined'. However, there are noticeable lexical and collocation errors, including 'population of new visitors' instead of 'number of new visitors', and agreement slips like 'tourist' instead of 'tourists'. Less common vocabulary is attempted with mixed success, and word choices are occasionally imprecise. These errors do not impede communication, placing the response comfortably in the Band 6 category.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
The writer uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, incorporating subordinate clauses and conjunctions such as 'whereas' and 'before experiencing'. Grammatical control is mixed; there are several errors in subject-verb agreement and punctuation, such as 'numbers were 12000 and 15000 respectively' lacking a subject, and comma splices or unnecessary commas like 'First of all, In 2000'. Complex structures are attempted with varying accuracy, but the errors rarely impede the reader's understanding, reflecting the characteristics of Band 6.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.