Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-09-25

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The graph illustrates the amount of first time tourists in comparison to the number returning tourists for the Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

In a cursory glance, it is evident that the graph displays a dramatic surge in the returning visitors, in comparison to the initial decline in the number of first time visitors in first two, eventually facing a steady increase to almost 12000 visitors in 2008.

The gradient of the returning tourists indicate a sharp peak from almost 3000 visitors in 2000 to 10000 visitors in 2002, afterwards the curve rose to a steady number of around 15000 visitors in 2006, before encountering the small dip to approximately 13800 vistors in 2008.

The trend of the graph of first time tourists visualizes a steep downward slope from 8000 visitors in 2000 to 4000 visitors in 2002. After 2002 the graph rose to a peak of 12000 in 2007.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The student attempts to address the task by reporting the main trends for both first-time and returning visitors to Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008. An overview is provided in the second paragraph, capturing the overall direction of both datasets. Key data points are mentioned, such as the peak of returning visitors around 15000 in 2006 and the initial drop in first-time visitors down to 4000 in 2002. However, there are some inaccuracies and omissions when compared against the visual data. For instance, the student states that the first-time visitors rose to a peak of 12000 in 2007, which is inaccurate according to the graph, and some data points are slightly misreported (e.g., 13800 visitors in 2008 for returning visitors instead of approximately 13400). Furthermore, the data reporting lacks completeness for certain intervals. Consequently, the response achieves a Band 6.0.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response is arranged coherently, with a clear introduction, overview, and body paragraphs dedicated to the respective visitor trends. Cohesive devices are used to link ideas, such as 'In a cursory glance', 'afterwards', and 'before encountering'. However, some referencing and cohesive links feel slightly mechanical or awkward, such as 'The gradient of the returning tourists indicate' and 'The trend of the graph of first time tourists visualizes'. Paragraphing is utilized, though the structural division could be refined for better flow and progression. Referencing within sentences is generally clear, but the logical progression between sentences occasionally falters due to clumsy phrasing. This performance aligns well with the descriptors for Band 6.0.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The student demonstrates an adequate vocabulary for the task, attempting some less common lexical items such as 'dramatic surge', 'gradient', and 'fluctuates' (implied by upward/downward movements). However, there are notable word choice and collocation errors that detract from precision. For example, writing 'the amount of first time tourists' is inaccurate since visitors are countable (number of tourists). Additionally, expressions like 'in first two' are grammatically incomplete, and 'vistors' contains a spelling error. While the vocabulary is sufficient to convey the general meaning, these inaccuracies place the response firmly in the Band 6.0 category.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, incorporating relative clauses and participial phrases such as 'before encountering the small dip to approximately 13800 vistors'. However, grammatical errors are frequent throughout the text. Examples include subject-verb agreement errors like 'The gradient of the returning tourists indicate' (should be 'indicates') and missing words in 'in first two' (should be 'in the first two years'). Punctuation and phrasing are occasionally awkward, which slightly impedes readability. Because simple sentences are generally controlled while complex structures introduce errors that persist, the grammar performance corresponds to a Band 6.0.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.