Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-09-29

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The line graph illustrates how many people visited Caryl Island for the first time and not the first time from 2000 to 2008 .

Overall, the number of the returning visitors in Island was always bigger than number of first time visitors but not since the beginig .

Initially , in almost 2021 we can see that the number of visitors for thier first time in Island was 8000 visitor , which is quiet more than the double number of the visitors returning. However , in 2002 the number of the two type of visitors was equal .

Furthermore , after that slight increase for the returning visitors from 2002 till 2007 there was a massive resurgence to a high point of more than 14000 visitor . before , recording a reced to less than 1400 visitor in 2008 . In the other hand , after the slight low from 2000 till almost 2001 , the number of the returning visitors kept increasing till 2008 where it reached 12000 visitor .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

The student attempts to cover the main features of the line graph regarding visitors to Caryl Island, but there are several factual inaccuracies and misreadings of the data. For instance, the text states that in 2002 the number of the two types of visitors was equal, whereas the graph shows first-time visitors at 4,000 and returning visitors at 10,000. Furthermore, the timeline is confused with references to '2021', and the trends are inaccurately described or mismatched between the two categories. While an overview is attempted, the severe data misinterpretation prevents a higher score, placing it at Band 4.5.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response is divided into paragraphs, but the overall logical progression is frequently disrupted by confusing statements and flawed cohesive devices. Phrases such as 'In the other hand' and 'before, recording a reced' are misused or awkward, making the sequence of ideas difficult to follow. Referencing is also unclear in places, such as 'returning visitors in Island was always bigger than number... but not since the beginig'. Paragraphing is attempted, but the internal cohesion and linking of ideas require significant improvement, leading to a Band 5.0 score.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is very basic and repetitive, with noticeable errors in word choice and spelling throughout the response. Examples include 'beginig', 'thier', 'quiet' instead of quite, and 'reced' instead of drop or decrease. The student attempts some less common terms like 'resurgence', but they are often applied inaccurately or linked to the wrong data series. Spelling and word-formation errors occasionally strain the reader, fitting the Band 5.0 descriptor profile.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The writing contains a limited range of sentence structures with frequent grammatical and punctuation errors. There are issues with subject-verb agreement, article usage ('in Island', 'the double number'), and sentence fragmentation (e.g., starting clauses with 'before, recording...'). Complex structures are attempted but are often faulty and awkward. Although the general meaning can sometimes be extracted, the high frequency of errors causes significant difficulty for the reader, corresponding to a Band 4.5.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.