Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-06

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The multiple line chart illustrates the data about visitors who visits Caryl island for the first time and the returning visitors within the timeframe of 8 years starting from 2000 to 2008.

Considering from an overall perspective, it can be comprehensively observed that the number of returning visitors are much higher compare to the first time visitor for the given period.

To begin with, In 2000, the figures for first time visitors is 8000 before witnessing a significant fall to 4000 in 2002. However, the numbers than increased steadily and experience a huge rise in the numbers at approximately 12000 visitors in beginning of 2008.

Furthermore, the numbers of the returning visitors are very few in the beginning at around 2900 which than shows a rapid increase to 10000 returning visitors in 2002. Moreover, again it showed a gradual increase to 12000 in 2004 and still the numbers were rising and witnessed the highest numbers at around 15000 returning visitors in 2006 before witnessing a slight decline to approximately 13500 in the final year.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

The response successfully addresses all parts of the prompt by providing a clear summary of the overall trends and key features of the data regarding first-time and returning visitors to Caryl Island. An overview is present, and the main data points, such as the peak for returning visitors in 2006 and the fluctuations for first-time visitors, are accurately reported and compared. However, some aspects of the response sit comfortably at this level because certain data points are under-developed or lack full contextualisation. For instance, the discussion of the final year could be integrated more smoothly into the overarching comparative narrative. To reach the next level, the overview needs to be slightly more sharply defined, capturing the broader trajectory of both data sets with greater precision.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The response demonstrates a clear logical organisation and progression throughout, meeting the criteria for a well-structured essay. Information is presented in a logical sequence, moving from an introduction to an overall trend and then breaking down the specific details for each category into separate paragraphs. Cohesive devices such as 'To begin with', 'Furthermore', and 'before witnessing' are used effectively to guide the reader through the data, although occasional mechanical transitions appear. Paragraphing is used appropriately to separate different categories of visitors. To achieve a higher band, the transitions between sentences could feel more natural and fluid, reducing the reliance on standard formulaic connectors.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, successfully conveying the trends shown in the line graph through words like 'fluctuate', 'significant fall', 'steady', and 'decline'. The writer makes some attempts to use less common vocabulary items such as 'timeframe' and 'approximately', but there are occasional word choice and collocation inaccuracies, such as 'visitors who visits' instead of 'visitors who visited' and 'numbers than increased' instead of 'then increased'. Spelling and word-form errors are present but do not impede communication. To move to a higher band, the writer needs to incorporate a wider range of sophisticated lexical items with greater precision and avoid basic slips in word choice.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response employs a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, such as introductory prepositional phrases and subordinate clauses introduced by 'before' and 'while'. However, there are noticeable grammatical errors throughout the text, including subject-verb agreement issues like 'the number of returning visitors are' instead of 'is', tense inconsistencies such as 'the figures for first time visitors is' in a past-tense context, and spelling-confused lexical choices treated as grammatical slips. While these errors rarely impede communication, they restrict the score. To attain a higher band, the writer must produce a greater proportion of error-free complex sentences and maintain strict consistency in tense and agreement.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.