Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-06

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The given line graph illustrates about first time visitors and who came again to re-visit the Caryl Island between 2000 and 2008.

Overall, in 2000s just over 3000 tourist came to see the Island but after that visitors popped significantly until 2006. Later, interest were down for the public to show-up. Whereas returning travelers began to rise from 2002, and showed graudal increase towards the end.

Initially, at the start, only around 3000 people came to the place for the first time and just after two years, numbers were increased significantly upto 10000 in 2002. The numbers were gradually rising and stopped approximately at 15000 until 2006. later, it was decreased in 2008.

In contrast, the returning tourist also had a dramatic decrease in 2002. suddenly, it showed drastic rise into returning visitors and it shows gradual increase of 6000,9000 and 12000 in 2004, 2006 and 2008 respectively.

Overall, the very first time travelers showcased increase but in later, it dropped in 2008. While returning tourist had great amount of repeat travelers at the end.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

The response only partially addresses the prompt and contains significant confusion regarding the data presented in the line graph. The writer mixes up the trends for first-time visitors and returning visitors, leading to an inaccurate overview and body paragraphs that contradict the visual data. For instance, the student states that returning visitors had a dramatic decrease in 2002 and a sudden rise, whereas the graph actually shows returning visitors shooting up sharply in 2002 while first-time visitors dropped. Furthermore, the information is repetitive, with multiple overview-style summaries included near the beginning and the end. To move towards a higher band, the response must accurately report and compare the key features of the data without confusing the two data series, and avoid unnecessary repetition.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

There is some organisation, but the overall progression of information is hindered by poor referencing and confusing switching between data sets. Paragraphing is attempted, but the logical structure breaks down because the body paragraphs reiterate general summaries rather than methodically reporting specific data points. Cohesive devices are used awkwardly or inaccurately, such as the redundant transition 'In contrast, the returning tourist also had a dramatic decrease' followed by contradictory claims. To improve coherence and achieve a higher band, ideas need to be logically sequenced with clearer transitions, ensuring that each paragraph presents distinct, well-ordered information without duplicating overview statements.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The vocabulary used is limited and minimally adequate for the task. There are noticeable lexical errors and inappropriate word choices, such as 'tourist came to see the Island', 'visitors popped significantly', and 'interest were down for the public to show-up'. Some word forms and plurals are also awkward or incorrect, like 'returning tourist' used instead of plural forms or nouns. While the vocabulary is sufficient to convey a very basic meaning, these frequent lexical inaccuracies and simplistic expressions restrict the response from reaching a higher band. To improve, the student should expand their range of vocabulary to include precise reporting verbs and accurate topic-specific collocations.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response demonstrates a very limited range of grammatical structures, relying mostly on simple sentences with frequent errors when attempting complex forms. There are recurring issues with verb tenses, subject-verb agreement, and articles, such as 'the very first time travelers showcased increase' and 'numbers were increased significantly upto 10000'. Prepositions inside grammatical patterns and punctuation are also handled inaccurately, causing occasional difficulty for the reader. To progress to a higher band, the writer needs to incorporate a wider variety of accurate sentence structures, maintain consistent past tense verbs for historical data, and eliminate basic grammatical slips.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.