Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-10
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.
Student answer (Band 5.0)
The line graph illustrates that, calculations between two countries who are first time visitors and returning visitors. who have visited in Caryl Island into 2000 to 2008.
Overall,the number of returning visitors increased more than the first time visitors. Both of them are increased at this period, while there were some fluctuation before in numbers.
In 2000, there was around 8000 first time visitors in a cary island. However, there was a quick fall at 4000 in 2002. It increased at 6000 in 2004 and 9000 in 2006. Finally, the figure reached from 12000 in 2008.
The number of returning visitors have around 3000 at first in 2000. It is increased heavily upto 10000 in 2002 and reached 12000 in 2004. The number reached highest point 15000 in 2006. However, it is decreased slightly 13000 in 2008.After the decrease of returning visitors but also first time visitors are were still numerous.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.5 |
| Overall | 5.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
You report the main movements for both visitor groups and include several relevant figures: first-time visitors fall from about 8,000 to 4,000 before rising, while returning visitors climb from roughly 3,000 to a peak of 15,000 and then decline. The overview also identifies the stronger growth in returning visitors. However, the opening description is unclear, and the overview says both groups increased, which misses the first-time visitors’ initial fall and the returning visitors’ final decrease. The closing claim that first-time visitors were “still numerous” is vague and does not make a useful comparison. To make the summary more complete, state the contrasting overall patterns clearly and compare the groups at the end of the period.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for each visitor group. This helps the reader follow the two series, and time markers such as “In 2000,” “in 2002,” and “Finally” provide some sequence. However, progression is weakened by unclear or awkward links, especially “After the decrease of returning visitors but also first time visitors are were still numerous,” which does not clearly connect to the preceding information. The overview also repeats a broad trend without setting out the key contrast. Use clearer transitions to show changes and comparisons, and make each paragraph develop one coherent point rather than adding an unclear final sentence.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use some relevant vocabulary for describing a graph, including “fall,” “increased,” “reached,” “highest point,” and “decreased slightly.” These choices make the main movements understandable. However, the range is limited and several phrases are inaccurate or unnatural, such as “calculations between two countries,” “increased heavily,” and “reached from 12000.” The repeated use of “number” and “reached” also makes the description less precise. Choose standard graph language and vary it where appropriate—for example, describe a figure as rising, peaking, or ending at a value. More accurate collocations would make the account clearer and more natural.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5
The response attempts both simple and more extended sentences, and the reader can generally identify the years and figures being described. However, errors in sentence formation and verb forms are frequent enough to make some statements difficult to follow. For example, “The number of returning visitors have around 3000” has incorrect agreement and an incomplete verb pattern, while “Both of them are increased” uses an incorrect passive form. The opening sentence is also fragmented, and “first time visitors are were” contains competing verb forms. Practise forming complete clauses with consistent past-tense verbs, and check subject–verb agreement, articles, and punctuation. Clearer sentence patterns will help your data comparisons come across accurately.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
