Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-10

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The line graph shows difference between the number of first time visitors and returning visitors in different years from 2000 to 2008 who visited Caryl Island.

In 2008 during first time visite where large number of people visited the Caryl Island.While in 2002 only small group visited the Island that were only 400.Then after 2002 to 2008 gradually increased number of people to visit the Caryl Island.

On the other hand,if we look people increased slowely from 2000 and reached at top in 2006 where large number of people visited wew 15000 plu.In that year larged amount of people were came visite that Island that other years.However this crowed decreased in 2008 and 13000 plus people visited.

In conclusion,first time visitors start from 8000 in 2000 and moved down in 2002 with 4000 visiters.After that they increased gradually till 2008 with almost 12000 visitors.But second time vitors started from 2000 to 2006 wew moving up with people 3000 to 15000 plu respectively.Then slowed down in 2008.Second time greater number of people visited than first time visitos.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the two visitor groups and report several important movements, including the first-time visitors’ fall from 8,000 to 4,000 and subsequent rise, and the returning visitors’ peak around 2006 followed by a decline. However, some figures and descriptions are inaccurate: first-time visitors were about 11,800 in 2008, not simply a “large number,” and returning visitors began at 3,000 in 2000, not 2,000. The statement that 2002 had “only 400” visitors is also incorrect; it appears to refer to 4,000 first-time visitors. The overview is present but unclear, and the comparison between the groups is only briefly stated. Select the main trends accurately and summarise them clearly before giving supporting figures.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has some organisation: it introduces the graph, discusses first-time visitors, then returning visitors, and ends with a comparison. This gives the reader a basic route through the information. However, the progression is weakened by unclear references and repetitive summaries. For example, “In that year” does not clearly identify the year, while “On the other hand” introduces a group without a precise contrast. The conclusion repeats much of the earlier description rather than adding a concise overview. Paragraphing is also uneven, with the returning-visitors discussion and conclusion running together. Use a clear overview paragraph followed by one paragraph for each series, and connect comparisons directly to the relevant years.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant task vocabulary, including “first time visitors,” “returning visitors,” “increased,” “decreased,” and “reached at top,” so the main subject is generally recognisable. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate, such as “large number of people visited,” “crowed decreased,” and “second time visitors.” Spelling errors—including “slowely,” “visiters,” and “vit ors”—also make the writing less clear and less controlled. Aim for precise chart language and check spelling carefully. For example, describe figures as visitor numbers that “rose,” “fell,” or “peaked,” rather than repeatedly referring to a large group of people.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

The response attempts a mixture of simple statements and longer sentences, and the reader can usually identify the intended trends. However, sentence structures are limited and errors are frequent enough to make some relationships difficult to follow. Examples include “In 2008 during first time visite where large number,” which lacks a complete, well-formed clause, and “people increased slowely,” where the subject and verb do not express the intended meaning. Articles and sentence boundaries are also inconsistent, as in “visited the Caryl Island.While” and “In conclusion,first time visitors.” Practise complete subject–verb clauses and use past-tense forms consistently. Separate sentences with appropriate punctuation and check agreement and article use.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.