Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-11

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The graph chart illustrates about two types of visitor who visit first time and who returned for second visit from 2000 to 2008 in Caryl Island.

On the one side ,the first time visitor were 8000 people who visited in 2000.Then it decreased in people average to 4000 people in 2002.After that people became intreasted and many people started to went that island.It reached in peek with almost 12000 visitors in 2008.

One the other hand,if we look about returned visitors only little people visited who were 3000 in 2000.Moreover,many people started visiting the island and reached at top with 15000 people in 2006.After that it went down in 2008 with people 13000.It means that second time visitors were more than first time visitors.

In the end,overall result tells that higher number of people visited second time than first time visitors to visit Caryl Island and they enjoyed it.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify both visitor groups and report several key movements, including the first-time figure falling from 8,000 to 4,000 and returning visitors rising to a peak in 2006 before declining. However, the account is only partly accurate: first-time visitors reached about 11,800 in 2008, not “almost 12000” is acceptable as an approximation, but the important comparison that returning visitors were higher in 2002, 2004 and 2006 is not clearly traced. The closing claim that returning visitors were higher overall is too broad, since first-time visitors were higher in 2000 and 2008. The overview also repeats this generalisation rather than summarising the contrasting trends. The response is one word below the required minimum. Include a concise, accurate overview and compare the series across the period.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, separate paragraphs for the two visitor groups, and a concluding statement. This makes the main topic and broad sequence easy to follow. Linking phrases such as “After that,” “Moreover,” and “On the other hand” help signal movement between points, although some are used mechanically or do not express the relationship precisely. For example, “On the one side” and “One the other hand” are awkward transitions, and the final “In the end” repeats the overview rather than adding a clear synthesis. Referencing in “It means that” is also vague because the comparison is not specified. Group the trends more purposefully and use transitions that accurately show contrast or change.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant vocabulary for describing a graph, including “decreased,” “reached,” “top,” and “went down,” so the reader can understand the general direction of change. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate or informal, such as “the graph chart,” “people average,” “became intreasted,” and “reached in peek.” Spelling errors, including “intreasted” and “peek,” also make the writing less clear and polished. Repetition of “people” and “visitors” limits precision. Use standard trend language consistently—for example, “fell to,” “rose to a peak of,” and “declined”—and check spelling and collocations before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt some longer sentences and use past-tense forms to describe the historical data, but the range of sentence structures is limited and errors occur frequently. Examples include “the first time visitor were 8000 people,” where subject–verb agreement and plural form are incorrect, and “many people started to went,” where the verb pattern is faulty. Articles and prepositions are also often missing or misplaced, as in “visited that island” and “reached at top.” Some sentences are understandable, but these errors make the description less fluent and can obscure relationships between ideas. Practise accurate simple past forms and build longer sentences from reliable patterns, such as “The figure rose from X to Y before falling to Z.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.