Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 4.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-11
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.
Student answer (Band 4.5)
The line graph indicates the number of visitors are visited from 2000 to 2008.In the year 2000 the ratio of number of visitors are high as compared to 2008.But the line rise in 2002 where the tourist did not show their interest in first time.the line show a sharp effect and show the interest of returning visitors.
The old visitors line increase in a bit change, but the returning visitors have a great alteration in their move that show an obvious change in 2006.this is a strippened move .That take Caryl island into the highest point 15000. But after some time it comes down from 15000 points to 14000 in 2007 .As we talked about first time visitors they were at 10000 points that show very wide difference.The returning visitors also come down gradually from 14000 points to 13000 in the year of 2008.On the other hand first time visitors were at a point of 11000.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 4.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 4.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.5 |
| Overall | 4.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0
You identify the two visitor groups and report several relevant movements, including the rise in returning visitors to a peak of about 15,000 in 2006 and the increase in first-time visitors towards 2008. However, the account only partially summarises the graph: there is no clear overview of the main contrast, and some comparisons are inaccurate or unclear. For example, first-time visitors were about 4,000 in 2002, not around 10,000, and returning visitors peaked in 2006 before falling to roughly 13,400 in 2008. The opening comparison between 2000 and 2008 is also difficult to interpret. Select the key trends accurately and state them clearly in an overview before giving supporting figures.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5
The response follows the time period broadly and uses a few linking expressions, such as “But,” “As we talked about,” and “On the other hand.” These help signal some comparisons, but the ideas do not develop in a clear overall sequence. The response is presented as one paragraph, and shifts between the two visitor groups make the comparisons difficult to follow. References such as “the line” and “that” are sometimes unclear, while “after some time” does not specify the point in the timeline. Organise the report into an introduction, a concise overview, and detail paragraphs grouped by trend or visitor type. Use precise time references and connect comparisons directly rather than relying on loosely related transitions.
Lexical Resource: Band 4.5
You use some task-related vocabulary, including “visitors,” “returning visitors,” “increase,” and “highest point,” so the reader can recognise the general subject. However, the range is limited and several choices are inaccurate or unnatural, which sometimes makes the meaning difficult to understand. For instance, “the ratio of number of visitors are high” does not clearly describe a number, and “a strippened move” is not an appropriate description of a sharp rise. “Old visitors” is also an imprecise label for returning visitors. Aim for accurate graph language and natural collocations, such as “the figure for returning visitors rose sharply” and “first-time visitors.” Check spelling and avoid vague phrases such as “great alteration in their move.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5
The response attempts to combine ideas using clauses, for example, “where the tourist did not show their interest in first time,” but sentence structures are often faulty and the meaning can be hard to follow. Errors include subject–verb agreement in “the number of visitors are,” missing or incorrect articles and prepositions in “in first time,” and inconsistent tense and sentence boundaries. Several sentences run together without appropriate punctuation, as in “2008.In the year 2000,” while fragments such as “That take Caryl island into the highest point” do not form a complete, accurate sentence. Use straightforward past-tense sentences to report the data, check agreement and articles, and separate each main point with clear punctuation before attempting more complex structures.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
