Band 7.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 7.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-12

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Student answer (Band 7.0)

The graph illustrates the number of visitors of Caryl Island who visited for the first time and returned the Island between 2000 and 2008.

Overall, it is evident that, the number of returning visitors experienced the rapid growth, while the first time visitors dropped initially before rising sharply throughout the period.

In terms of first time visitors, the number was much higher than returning visitors which was almost 8000 in 2000. After that, this value started falling significantly and reached to 4000 visitors in 2002. Furthermore, the first time visitors witnessed upward trend for the next 6 years.The number of first time visitors rose to almost 12000 individuals.

Regarding the returning visitors, the number was increased steeply from almost 3000 individuals in 2000 to 10000 individuals in 2002. Moreover, the visitors continued rising, and in 2006, it reached to a peak at almost 15000 individuals. But, then it began to fall and ended with around 13500 visitors by the end of 2008.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.5

You identify the main contrast and give a clear overview: returning visitors rose substantially before declining, while first-time visitors fell and then recovered. Most reported figures match the graph, including the 2002 low of about 4,000 first-time visitors and the returning-visitor peak of roughly 15,000 in 2006. However, one comparison is reversed: you say first-time visitors were “much higher than returning visitors” in 2000, when the figures were about 8,000 and 3,000 respectively only if the first figure is correctly assigned; your sentence then says “which was almost 8000,” making the comparison unclear and apparently attributing that value to returning visitors. Also, the first-time series ends at about 11,800, not 12,000 exactly. Clearer attribution and more precise comparisons would strengthen an otherwise well-focused summary.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The response has a clear overall progression: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for each visitor group. This makes the two trends easy to follow, and linking expressions such as “After that,” “Furthermore,” and “Regarding” help signal movement through the data. Some connections are less smooth or slightly mechanical, however. The first-time-visitors paragraph begins with a comparison but then shifts to the decline without clearly identifying which figure is being discussed; this weakens the reference in “this value.” The final paragraph also uses “Moreover” and “But” in close succession to mark the rise and fall. Make comparisons explicit and use transitions that reflect the precise relationship between points to make cohesion more flexible.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.5

You use an adequate range of trend vocabulary, including “falling significantly,” “upward trend,” “rose,” “peak,” and “began to fall.” These choices communicate the main movements, and attempts such as “experienced the rapid growth” show an effort to use more formal language. Some collocations and word choices are not natural or precise: “visitors of Caryl Island,” “returned the Island,” and “witnessed upward trend” could be expressed more idiomatically. “Rapid growth” also overstates the returning series across the whole period, since it declines after 2006. Aim for accurate, natural collocations and vary trend language without forcing formal-sounding phrases; this would add the flexibility and precision needed for a stronger performance.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You attempt a mix of simple and complex structures, including a contrast with “while” and time clauses such as “before rising sharply.” The meaning is generally understandable, but some grammatical errors remain. For example, “the number of returning visitors experienced the rapid growth” has an unnecessary article, while “the number was increased steeply” uses an incorrect passive form; write “the number increased steeply.” There are also errors in “reached to 4000” and “it reached to a peak,” where “reach” does not take “to,” and the comma after “evident that” is misplaced. Check verb forms, articles, and punctuation, and aim to produce more consistently accurate sentences while retaining your range of structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.