Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-16

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The line graph illustrates the number of people visited and those who left from Caryl island over a eight year period from 2000 to 2008.

Overall, the returning visitors numbers experienced an upward trajectory, whereas the number of first time visitors were remarkably faced a decline, however the number surged up later and remained volatile.

The amount of tourists returning at the time period in 2000 had rocketed and reached approximately 1000 at 2002 and in contrast to the past couple years, the rate slowed down attained 12000 in the year 2004 and reached a peak of 15000 by 2006 and after the number dropped to around 13000 by the end of 2008.

The number of new tourists had a great start at a number of 8000 in the year 2000. However, the numbers sharply plummeted to 4000 by 2002. Followingly, the figures grew throughout the entire timeline and marked the highest number, nearly 12000 by the end of 2008.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the two visitor groups and report several key movements, including the fall in first-time visitors to 4,000 in 2002 and their rise to about 12,000 by 2008. You also note that returning visitors peaked in 2006 before declining. However, the overview is unclear and partly inaccurate: returning visitors did not rise throughout the period, since they fell from about 15,200 to 13,400 after 2006, while first-time visitors initially declined and then rose. The opening also misidentifies the graph as showing people who “left,” rather than returning visitors. Some figures are misreported, notably 1,000 instead of approximately 10,000 in 2002. A clearer overview and more accurate comparisons would make the response more complete and precise.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for the two visitor groups. This makes the main information reasonably easy to locate. Time markers such as “by 2002,” “in 2004,” and “by the end of 2008” also help establish sequence. However, some connections are awkward or unclear. The overview’s “whereas …, however” combines contrasting linkers, and “in contrast to the past couple years” does not clearly explain the comparison. The returning-visitors paragraph also moves through the data in a confusing sentence, making the 2002 figure difficult to follow. Use shorter, clearly linked comparisons and ensure each paragraph progresses through the years in order.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use a reasonable range of trend vocabulary, including “plummeted,” “surged,” “trajectory,” and “peak,” which helps describe changes rather than merely list figures. Some choices, however, are inaccurate or unnatural for this graph. “People who … left” changes the meaning of returning visitors, while “rocketed” is used for a figure that is reported incorrectly and “the rate slowed down attained” is an awkward combination. “Remarkably faced a decline” and “Followingly” are also not natural collocations. Aim for precise, neutral chart language and use verbs that match the data, such as “rose,” “fell,” and “reached.” These issues do not prevent the reader from understanding the general trends, but they reduce precision.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of sentence forms, including a contrast in the overview and longer sentences describing changes over time. The main message is generally understandable, but some grammatical errors remain. For example, “the number of first time visitors were” has subject–verb disagreement, and “over a eight year period” needs the article “an.” In “the returning visitors numbers,” the noun phrase is not formed correctly; use “the number of returning visitors.” The long sentence beginning “The amount of tourists returning…” also lacks clear grammatical connections between its clauses. Check agreement, articles, and sentence boundaries, and use shorter sentences when reporting several dates. This would improve control while preserving your attempts at complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.