Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-17

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The line graph illustrates the number of tourists who visit caryl island first time and who returned from there among different years from 2000 to 2008.

Overall, it can be seen that large number of tourist visit caryl island first time in 2008 and minimum in 2002. Whereas, higher number of individuals returned from island in 2006 and lowest number tourists returned in 2000.

Looking at the line chart in more details.In year 2000 around 2500 tourist returned from island and 8000 visitors visit island first time in same year. Furthermore, the number of tourists visit first time decreased rapidly by half and who returned increased by 4x. In 2004 tourists rate who visited island first time reached at 6000 and returned rate also increased by 2000.

Moreover, in the next two years first time visited rate inclined by 4000 and retuned rate reached at around 14500. In addition, returned rate decreased by approximately 1000 and tourists who visited island first time inclined by 2000 again in 2008.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You identify the main overall patterns: first-time visits reach their lowest point in 2002 and then rise, while returning visits peak in 2006 and are lowest in 2000. The response also includes relevant figures, such as 8,000 first-time visitors in 2000 and about 6,000 in 2004. However, some details are inaccurate or unclear: returning visitors rose from about 3,000 to 10,000 by 2002, which is not a fourfold increase, and the 2006 figure is closer to 15,200 than 14,500. The overview could compare the series more directly and state that returning visitors outnumbered first-time visitors from 2002 onward. Some trends are reported, but these comparisons and precise figures need clearer development.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure, moving from an introduction and overview to chronological details, and paragraphing helps distinguish the main summary from supporting information. Linking expressions such as “Overall,” “Furthermore,” and “Moreover” make the sequence easy to follow, and the reader can generally track changes across the years. This already shows a coherent progression. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear: “In addition” introduces another 2008 change without explaining the contrast between the two visitor groups, and “In year 2000” is followed by a sentence fragment-like transition in “Looking at the line chart in more details.” Grouping the figures into clearer comparisons would make cohesion more flexible and less dependent on repeated connectors.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a reasonable range of task-related vocabulary, including “decreased,” “increased,” “reached,” and “inclined,” and the reader can understand the broad trends. However, several choices are inaccurate or unnatural for describing a graph: “tourists rate,” “returned rate,” and “first time visited rate” do not clearly name the figures, while “increased by 4x” is imprecise. There are also spelling and form errors, including “retuned” and inconsistent capitalisation of “Caryl Island.” Repetition of “number of tourists” and “rate” limits flexibility. Use precise terms such as “visitor numbers,” “first-time visitors,” and “returning visitors,” and choose verbs like “rose,” “fell,” or “peaked” according to the trend.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a contrast with “Whereas” and time-based clauses such as “in the next two years.” The main meaning is usually recoverable, but some grammatical errors make parts difficult to read. For example, “tourists who visit … first time” needs an article and a more suitable tense, and “the number of tourists visit first time decreased” has an incomplete verb pattern. The sentence beginning “Whereas” is not joined to a main clause, and punctuation is missing after “details.” Articles, plurals, and subject–verb forms also need attention. Practise writing complete comparison sentences, for example, “First-time visitor numbers fell to 4,000 in 2002, while returning visitors rose to 10,000.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.