Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-17
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.
Student answer (Band 6.0)
The line graph illustrates the amount of visitors visiting first time Caryl Island and returning back during the period of 2000 to 2008.
Overall, it is evident that returning visiotrs from Caryl Island has shown a significant increase. Whereas, the numbers of first time visitors are less than returning visitors over the given period of time.
Despite initially having low number of 3000 visitors returning back from Cryl island in 2000, it experiences a dramatic increase and reaches its peak of 15000 visitors coming back by 2006 and then saw decrease surpassing the first time visitors.
On the contrary, the people visiting Caryl Island first time despite having 8000 people more than people returning back intially it faces a sharp decline reaching 4000 visitors by 2002 and then follow the increasing trend and reaches the figure of 12000 people in 2008. This shows the number of visitors visiting first time are less than the people returning from Island.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 6.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 6.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5
You identify the two visitor groups and describe several key movements, including returning visitors rising from about 3,000 to a peak near 15,000 in 2006, and first-time visitors falling before increasing. This covers the main task features and includes an overview. However, the overview is not fully accurate: returning visitors do not increase overall, since they finish below their 2006 peak, and first-time visitors are not lower than returning visitors throughout—the first-time figure is higher in 2000. The final first-time figure is also closer to 11,800 than 12,000, while returning visitors end at about 13,400. More precise comparisons and a clearer account of both series’ overall changes would strengthen the response.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0
The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and separate descriptions of the two visitor groups. This gives the reader a generally coherent route through the information. However, progression is weakened by unclear or contradictory comparisons. For example, the overview says first-time visitors are fewer throughout, but the later paragraph correctly notes that they began at 8,000 compared with 3,000 returning visitors. The linkers “Whereas” and “On the contrary” do not always express the relationships clearly, and the final sentence repeats the earlier comparison rather than adding a useful summary. Organise the body around the trends and their comparison, and use linking phrases only where their logical relationship is clear.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
You use some relevant trend vocabulary, including “dramatic increase,” “sharp decline,” “peak,” and “increasing trend,” which helps communicate the graph’s movements. However, the range is limited by repeated or awkward expressions such as “visitors visiting,” “returning back,” and “people visiting Caryl Island first time.” Some word choices are inaccurate or imprecise, including “amount of visitors” for a countable group and “surpassing” where the intended comparison is unclear. Spelling errors such as “visiotrs” and “Cryl” also reduce control. Aim for concise, conventional graph language and vary “visitors” with accurate references such as “the figure” or “the number.”
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5
You attempt both simple and more complex sentences, including a contrast with “Whereas” and a longer sentence describing the returning-visitor trend. Meaning is generally recoverable, but some grammatical errors and awkward constructions remain. For example, “returning visiotrs … has shown” has subject–verb agreement problems, while “first time visitors … it faces a sharp decline” shifts from a plural subject to “it.” Articles and sentence boundaries also need attention, as in “Despite initially having low number of 3000 visitors.” Use consistent subjects and check agreement, articles, and punctuation when joining clauses. More accurate control of these patterns would make the complex sentences easier to follow.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
