Band 4.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 4.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-19
IELTS Writing Task 1 question
The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.
Student answer (Band 4.0)
The line graph illustrates the number of first time visitors amd returning visitors who visited Caryl Island 2000 to 2008.
Overall, the line graph compare the visitors who visited the first time and the returning visitors who visted Caryl Island in 2000 to 2008.
First of all, the numbers of visitors who visited first time Caryl Island in 2000, the numbers are 8000 and after two years , the visitors had decreased 4000 compare to visitors in 2000. But the visitors continously increased, who first time visted Caryl Island.The number of visitors who increased after 2000, after
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 3.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 4.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 4.5 |
| Overall | 4.0 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 3.0
The response identifies the two visitor groups and gives one accurate figure: first-time visitors numbered 8,000 in 2000, then fell to 4,000 in 2002. However, it stops before reporting the rest of the graph, so the main features and comparisons are largely missing. In particular, it does not describe the rise in first-time visitors after 2002 or the overall increase in returning visitors, which peaked in 2006 before declining. The overview merely repeats the task rather than summarising the trends. The response is also 53 words below the required minimum, leaving too little detail to fulfil the task. To improve, provide a clear overview and select key figures and changes for both series across the period.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.0
There is a basic attempt to organise the response, beginning with an introduction and then moving to a detail about first-time visitors. However, the overview repeats the introduction instead of guiding the reader through the main trends, and the discussion does not progress to the returning visitors. The final sentence is unfinished—“The number of visitors who increased after 2000, after”—so the sequence of ideas breaks down. Linking expressions such as “Overall” and “First of all” are present, but they do not create a complete or logical account. Use separate paragraphs for an overview and the key details, and organise the figures chronologically or by visitor group, completing each comparison before moving on.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The vocabulary is sufficient to identify the topic and the two groups, using phrases such as “first time visitors,” “returning visitors,” “numbers,” and “decreased.” However, the range is limited and several expressions are repetitive or imprecise, especially repeated forms of “visitors who visited.” There are also noticeable spelling errors, including “amd,” “visted,” and “continously,” which reduce accuracy. More precise trend language would help describe the graph efficiently, for example “fell,” “recovered,” “rose steadily,” and “peaked.” Use “first-time visitors” as a consistent compound adjective and avoid repeating the full phrase “visitors who visited Caryl Island” when a shorter reference is clear.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5
The response attempts both simple and longer sentence forms, but control is inconsistent and errors sometimes make the relationships between ideas unclear. For example, “the line graph compare” has subject–verb disagreement, while “the numbers are 8000” does not fit the past-time description. The sentence beginning “But the visitors continously increased, who first time visted…” has an unclear clause structure, and the final sentence is incomplete. Articles and prepositions are also missing or awkward in phrases such as “visited first time Caryl Island” and “compare to visitors in 2000.” Aim for complete, direct sentences with consistent past tense: for example, “First-time visitor numbers fell from 8,000 in 2000 to 4,000 in 2002, before rising.”
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.
