Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-20

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The line graph illustrates the number of people who visited Caryl Island for the first time from 2000 to 2008. It also shows us the number of returning visitors who visited Caryl Island between 2000 and 2008.

Overall, the graph gives us the information that initially number of first time visitors were far more than the returning visitors but later the number of returning visitors took over the first time visitors. But one common thing is that both type of visitors had increased over time.

Lets talk about the returning visitors first. In 2000 the number of returning visitors who visited Caryl Island were around 3000 and then it saw a dramatic increase and reached 10000 in 2002. After that it increased gradually and reached 12000 in 2004. But after 2004 it increased rapidly again and reached around 15000 till 2006. From 2006 to 2008 it showed an unusual trend and dropped from 15000 to around 13500.

On the other hand, number of first time visitors who visited Caryl Island were around 8000 in 2000. The total dropped drastically and reached 4000 in 2002. But since then the number of first time visitors has increased rapidly and it stood at 12000 in 2008.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

You cover both visitor groups and give a clear overview of the main contrast: returning visitors overtake first-time visitors, while first-time numbers fall initially and then recover. Most figures are accurately reported, including the rise in returning visitors to about 15,000 in 2006 and their subsequent decline. However, the overview says both groups “had increased over time,” which over-generalises the pattern: first-time visitors end higher than they began, but returning visitors also finish below their 2006 peak. The final first-time figure is given as 12,000, whereas the graph indicates approximately 11,800, a small difference. To strengthen the response, make the overview more precise and compare the groups at key points, especially their relative positions in 2000 and 2008.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response is arranged in a clear sequence: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for returning and first-time visitors. This makes the two trends easy to follow, and transitions such as “On the other hand” help signal the shift between series. The progression within each account is also generally chronological. However, some linking is repetitive, particularly the repeated use of “and then,” “After that,” and “But,” which can make the account feel mechanical. The overview’s broad statement that both groups increased also weakens the connection between the summary and the detailed figures. For a more flexible, higher-level progression, group the data around turning points and comparisons rather than narrating every year in the same pattern.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of vocabulary to describe movement, including “dramatic increase,” “dropped drastically,” “increased rapidly,” and “gradually.” These choices make the main trends clear, and the reader can understand the report throughout. However, some expressions are imprecise or less natural for describing a graph. “Took over” is conversational, while “showed an unusual trend” does not accurately describe a predictable decline. Phrases such as “the graph gives us the information” and “the total dropped” are also vague or awkward. Aim for more precise trend language and avoid repeating “number of visitors” in full. More consistent use of terms such as “rose,” “fell,” “peaked,” and “ended at” would improve clarity and control.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and more complex sentences, including clauses introduced by “while,” “but,” and “after,” and most meanings remain clear. There are, however, some recurring errors in agreement and sentence construction. For example, “the number … were” should be “the number … was,” and “both type of visitors” should be “both types of visitors.” The opening overview also needs an article or possessive construction: “initially number” could be “initially, the number.” In “it stood at 12000,” the pronoun’s reference is not fully clear, and the final figure would be better expressed as “stood at approximately 11,800.” Check subject–verb agreement and punctuation, including the apostrophe in “Let’s,” while continuing to vary sentence structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.