Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-20

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The line graph illustrates the number of first time tourists and returning vistitors who explored Caryl Island between 2000 and 2008. The figures is measured in thousands.

Overall, the number of both visitors i the number of first time tourists was higher than returning visitors. In contrast, the number of returning gustets were esclate over the period.

In detail, in 2000 there were 8000 visitors who visted the Caryl Island for the first time. This figure diminish significantly and reached 4000 by 2002. After facing a great fell, this number surged significantly and reached 12000 by 2008.

Moving to the next, returning visitors number was smallest in 2000 approximately 3000. This number increase considerably around 10000 in 2002. This number grew again and reached atleast 15000 in 2006. After reaching on highest point, this number decline steadily around 13000 by the end of period.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You identify the two visitor groups and describe several key movements, including the first-time visitors’ fall from 8,000 to 4,000 and the returning visitors’ rise to a peak of about 15,000 in 2006. However, the overview is unclear and partly inaccurate: “the number of both visitors i the number of first time tourists was higher than returning visitors” contradicts the graph, since returning visitors outnumbered first-time visitors from 2002 onward. The first-time series also ends at about 11,800, not 12,000, and the response does not clearly compare the groups across the period. The response is 144 words, below the required 150. To improve, give a precise overview of the contrasting trends and check that each comparison matches the data.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs describing each visitor group. This makes the information reasonably easy to follow, and time markers such as “in 2000,” “by 2002,” and “by the end of period” help establish sequence. However, the overview is difficult to interpret, particularly “the number of both visitors i the number of first time tourists,” and “Moving to the next” is an awkward transition. Repeated use of “This number” also makes the descriptions feel mechanical and can obscure which series is being discussed. Use a concise overview, clearer transitions such as “Regarding returning visitors,” and vary references by naming the group when needed.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant vocabulary for describing trends, including “diminish,” “surged,” “increase,” and “decline,” and the reader can generally understand the intended changes. However, spelling errors and inaccurate word choices are noticeable, as in “vistitors,” “gustets,” “esclate,” “fell,” and “atleast.” Some expressions are also unnatural or imprecise: “faced a great fell,” “reached on highest point,” and “the number of returning visitors number.” These issues limit clarity and show that trend vocabulary is not yet controlled consistently. Aim for accurate, conventional collocations and proofread spelling; for example, use “fell sharply,” “rose considerably,” and “reached a peak” to describe the data.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response includes simple statements and some attempts to connect events, such as “After facing a great fell, this number surged significantly.” However, grammatical errors occur frequently and sometimes make relationships unclear. Examples include “The figures is measured,” where the subject and verb do not agree, and “the number of returning gustets were,” which also has agreement problems. Several sentences omit or misuse articles and prepositions, as in “visited the Caryl Island” and “reached on highest point”; verb forms are also inconsistent in “This number increase” and “this number decline.” Practise accurate past-tense reporting and subject–verb agreement, and build longer sentences only when you can control their structure.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.