Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-21

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The line graph illustrates the proportions of Caryls Island's new visitors and repeated explorers for between 2000 and 2008.

Overall, repeated visitors of Caryls Island dramatically increased and stood at its peak-value, while new visitors shown moderate decreased and then gradually increased respectively.

On the one hand, returned visitors stood at 2000 in 2000 then shown biggest inclined and stood at 10000 in 2002. After that, It gradually increased throughout the period of time and stood at its peak value over 14000 in 2006, thereby it shows slightly decreased and accounted for more then 12000 in the year of 2008.

On the second hand, New visitors watched at 8000 in 2000 and the proportion shown moderate decreased and figure out at 4000 in 2002. In addition, first visitors in 2004 stood at 6000 and shown a continuously increased and stood at its final number accounted for 12000 in the year of 2008.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You cover both visitor groups and identify the main overall contrast: returning visitors rise to a high point before falling, while first-time visitors fall initially and then recover. The figures generally follow the graph, including the first-time series at 8,000, 4,000 and 6,000, and the returning series at 10,000 in 2002. However, the overview is not fully accurate: returning visitors peak in 2006, but first-time visitors do not show a moderate decrease overall; they finish above their starting level. Some details are also imprecise, such as giving 2,000 rather than about 3,000 for returning visitors in 2000 and describing the 2004–2008 rise without the 2006 figure. A more precise overview and comparisons between the series would strengthen the report.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for the two visitor groups. This makes the information broadly easy to follow, and phrases such as “After that” and “In addition” help signal sequence. However, the organisation is somewhat mechanical, with “On the one hand” and “On the second hand” used to divide the series rather than to express a meaningful contrast. Some links are unclear or awkward, particularly “thereby it shows slightly decreased,” which makes the relationship between the peak and the final value difficult to follow. Grouping the figures into clearer stages and directly comparing the two series at key years would create smoother progression and more effective cohesion.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some relevant vocabulary for describing trends, including “increased,” “decreased,” “peak value” and “gradually,” so the reader can understand the general movement. There is also an attempt to vary wording, for example “new visitors” and “first visitors.” However, several choices are inaccurate or unnatural and make the report less precise: “repeated explorers” does not describe returning visitors, “biggest inclined” is not a suitable trend phrase, and “watched at” is not an appropriate way to report a figure. “Proportions” is also misleading because the graph gives numbers of visitors, not percentages. Aim for accurate, conventional collocations such as “rose sharply,” “reached a peak” and “stood at,” and avoid changing the graph’s categories.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentence forms, including clauses linked with “while,” “and” and “thereby.” However, control is inconsistent, and errors in verb forms, agreement, articles and sentence construction sometimes make the meaning harder to follow. For example, “repeated visitors … increased and stood at its peak-value” has an unclear subject–verb relationship, while “the proportion shown moderate decreased” is not grammatically formed. In “thereby it shows slightly decreased,” the verb pattern is also faulty. Use a consistent past tense for the historical data and check that each sentence has a clear subject and correctly formed verb. Shorter, accurate sentences would help before adding more complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.