Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-23

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The given line graph illustreas the information about the number of turist who visit Caryl island between 2000 and 2008 .

Overall, it can be clearly seen that, first time visitors accounted for the highest number in 2000 while, returning visitors have accounted the lowest numbers in the same year.

To begin with that, 8000 thousands peopel have explored Caryl island for the first time in 2000 whereas, only 3000 tourist had visited again that island. In 2002 , the number of traveller who visited one more time has incresed from 3000 to 10000 on the other hand, the numbers of first time viewers has decline the half number. Both catagariory shows the increment of 2000 people in 2004. The figurs for first time visitors and returning visitors were 9600 and 15300 in 2006. In 2008, the numbers of people who visits again was decline under 14000 whlie, the numbers of first time visitors was rose by nearly 12000 .

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the two visitor groups and report several key figures, including 8,000 first-time visitors and 3,000 returning visitors in 2000, followed by the sharp rise in returning visitors by 2002. However, the overview is not fully accurate: first-time visitors were not the highest group across the period, and returning visitors did not remain the lowest after 2000. The main overall pattern is that returning visitors rose to a peak in 2006 before falling, while first-time visitors dipped in 2002 and then increased. Some later figures are also inaccurate: the chart shows about 9,300 and 15,200 in 2006, rather than 9,600 and 15,300. A clearer overview and more precise comparisons would strengthen the report.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable sequence: an introduction, an overview, and a chronological account of the figures. This makes the general development reasonably easy to follow. However, the overview does not accurately summarise the main trends, and several transitions are awkward or mechanically joined, as in “In 2002 ... on the other hand” and “In 2008 ... whlie.” The sentence about both categories increasing in 2004 is also unclear because it does not specify their values or explain how they compare. Use clearer sentence boundaries and organise the details into two groups—for example, the early changes and the later trends—so comparisons are easier to track.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some relevant vocabulary for describing a graph, including “increased,” “decline,” “number,” and “first time visitors.” However, the range is limited and several word choices or forms are inaccurate, which sometimes makes the meaning less clear. For example, “first time viewers” is not an appropriate label for visitors, and “visited again that island” is an unnatural way to describe returning visitors. There are also noticeable spelling errors such as “illustreas,” “turist,” “peopel,” and “catagariory.” Aim for accurate, consistent terms such as “first-time visitors” and “returning visitors,” and use precise trend language rather than repeating general words like “number.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt a mixture of simple and longer sentences, including comparisons with “whereas” and “on the other hand.” However, complex sentences are often faulty, and errors in tense, agreement, articles, and punctuation recur. For example, “the number ... has incresed” does not maintain an appropriate past-tense form for the period shown, while “the numbers ... was decline” has problems with both agreement and verb construction. The opening sentence also contains awkward clause structure and punctuation. Practise forming accurate past-simple descriptions, such as “the number rose” or “visitor numbers fell,” and check subject–verb agreement and sentence boundaries before using linking clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.