Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-24

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

THE LINE GRAPH SHOWS TWO TYPES OF VISITORS. FRIST TIME VISTPRS AND THE SECOND TIME VISTORS TO THE CARYL ISLAND FROM 2000 TO 2008.

FRISTLY, THE BLUE LINE SHOWS THE NUMBER OF FRIST VISITORS.WHICH SHOWS THAT EIGHT THOUSAND PEOPLE VISITES THE CAEYL ISLAND.THE NUMBER OF VISITORS DECREASE IN THE YEAR 2002 TO JUST FOUR THOUSAND PEOPLES. AND FROM TWO THOUSAND TWO TO TILL TWO THOUSAND EIGHT THE NUMBER GROW CONTINOUSLY TO TWELVE THOUSAND PEOPLE VISITING CARYL ISLAND.

SECONDLY, THE RED LINE DEMONESTRATE THE NUMBER OF REPITIVE VISTORS WHICH ALSO START FROM TWO THOUSAND AND NUMBER OF THR REPETITVE VISTOR IS ROUND ABOUT THREE THOUSAND PEOPLE.HOWEVER,THE NUMBER OF REPETIATIVE VISTORS GROWS TREMENDOUSLY TO FIFTHTEEN THOUSAND PEOPLE RETURNING VISITORS IN THE YEARS TWO THOUSAND EIGHT.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

You identify both visitor groups and describe some broad movements, including the first-time figure falling from 8,000 to 4,000 and returning visitors beginning at about 3,000. However, the account is incomplete and contains important inaccuracies: first-time visitors rise to about 11,800 by 2008, not 12,000 exactly as a continuous rise from 2002, while returning visitors peak at roughly 15,200 in 2006 and then fall to around 13,400 in 2008. The response does not give a clear overview of the main contrast or turning points, and the final figure is assigned to the wrong year. It is also 27 words below the required minimum, limiting the detail reported. Add an overview and accurately compare the series across the period.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a basic two-part structure: one paragraph describes first-time visitors and the next discusses returning visitors. Sequencing expressions such as “Firstly” and “Secondly,” together with “However,” help signal the movement between points. This gives the reader some organisation, but the progression within sentences is often difficult to follow. For example, “FRISTLY, THE BLUE LINE… WHICH SHOWS” leaves a fragment, and the final sentence combines growth, a peak, and a year without clearly separating them. The repeated all-capital presentation also makes the text less easy to read. Use complete sentences, group the key comparisons logically, and add a concise overview before the detailed figures.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “decrease,” “grows,” “visitors,” and “returning visitors,” so the basic subject is recognisable. However, the range is limited and several repeated or inaccurate expressions make the report less precise. “Repetitive visitors” and “second time visitors” are not natural labels for this data; use “returning visitors” consistently. There are also frequent spelling errors, such as “frist,” “vistprs,” “demonest rate,” and “continoously,” which can make the reader pause. Some wording is vague, including “grows tremendously,” where a measured description would be more suitable. Build a small set of accurate trend verbs and visitor-related terms, and check spelling before submitting.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response attempts both simple and longer sentence forms, but control is inconsistent, and errors sometimes make relationships between ideas unclear. For example, “THE NUMBER OF VISITORS DECREASE” has a subject–verb agreement error, while “WHICH SHOWS THAT…” is an incomplete clause rather than a complete sentence. The phrase “the number … is round about three thousand” also has awkward sentence construction, and the final sentence does not clearly connect the year with the peak value. Most sentences rely on basic patterns, with limited accurate use of complex structures. Practise writing complete sentences with a clear subject and verb, maintain past-tense reporting consistently, and use punctuation to separate each trend and its supporting figure.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.