Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-24

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The line chart illustates the figure of new visitors and the people who came second time to visit Caryl island between 2000 and 2008.

Overall,The number of people who visited the Caryl island for the first time was the highest intially.The figures of returning visitors was lowest in the begining but rose up throught out the period.

In 2000, reutrning visitors accounted for 3000 and stood at 10,000 in 2002 and made the significant grown.By 2004 it reached at 12,000, 15,000 in 2006 and dropped to13,500 in 2008.

Looking into the detail,first time visitors was the dominate sector in 2000 and account for 8,000. the figures declined to 4,000 in 2002.The numbers of people who are visiting Caryl island for the firstime started growing again and recorded as 6,000 in 2004,10,000 in 2006 and stopped at around 12,000 in 2008.

In comparsion,new visitor highest in 2000 but after some the figures started decclining.Whereas returning visitor made the highest growth throught the period.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You identify the main contrast: first-time visitors begin higher, while returning visitors rise sharply and finish above their initial level. The overview also notes the returning group’s low starting point and general increase, and most figures are close to the chart. However, the overview is not fully accurate: first-time visitors are highest initially, but returning visitors—not first-time visitors—reach the overall peak in 2006. The final comparison also says new visitors began declining, although they rose after 2002 and continued increasing to 2008. You report the key stages, but these conflicting summaries make some features less clear and developed than others. State the overall peak and the contrasting end-of-period trends precisely to strengthen the response.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a recognisable structure, moving from an introduction and overview to details about returning visitors, first-time visitors, and a comparison. This gives the reader a generally coherent route through the data. Some linking is effective, such as “By 2004” and “In comparison,” but the final comparison repeats earlier information and introduces a trend that conflicts with the preceding account. The overview is also joined awkwardly to its opening with “Overall,The,” and several detail sentences run together without spaces after commas or full stops. To make progression clearer, group the two series in a more balanced way and use the final paragraph to synthesise their different patterns rather than repeat them.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant chart vocabulary, including “accounted for,” “declined,” “reached,” and “figures,” and the reader can generally understand the intended trends. However, the range and control are limited by repeated general terms such as “figures” and “numbers,” as well as inaccurate or unnatural choices: “made the significant grown,” “stood at” for a changing figure, and “stopped at” for the final value. Spelling errors such as “illustates,” “begining,” “reutrning,” and “comparsion” are noticeable and reduce precision. Choose standard trend collocations and check spelling carefully; more accurate wording would make the numerical comparisons easier to follow.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response attempts both simple and more developed sentence forms, including “The numbers of people who are visiting … started growing again,” and uses past-tense reporting in several places. However, control is inconsistent, and errors occur in basic sentence patterns as well as longer clauses. Examples include “The figures of returning visitors was lowest,” where subject–verb agreement is incorrect, and “it reached at 12,000,” where the verb pattern is faulty. Articles and sentence boundaries are also problematic in “the Caryl island” and “Overall,The number.” These errors sometimes make relationships between figures less clear. Practise accurate past-tense reporting, agreement, articles, and punctuation, then proofread each sentence for a complete and correctly formed structure.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.