Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-27

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The line graph presents the nimber of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl island from 2000 to 2008. Overall, the proportion of first time visitors is way more than those who returned back.

Firstly, there was almost 8000 visitors wwho visited Caryl island in 2000. This number decreased and then reached 4000. This was the biggest loss overall in this graph. In 2004 again ,it increased by approximately 6000. It continuously keep increasing and reached 8000 in 2006. By 2008 it increased by approximately 12000.

The second line represents the number of visitor who return back from Caryl island. By 2000 the amount of returning visitors was 3000. It increased and reached 10000 in 2002. This was very huge rise level. Again then it increased by approximately 12000 while in 2006 it reached 15000. But then in 2008 it decreased by approximately 13000. In contrast, the proportion of returning visitors was higher than first time visitors at thhe last year.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.5

You report both visitor groups and several key movements, including the first-time visitors’ fall to about 4,000 in 2002 and the returning visitors’ rise to around 15,000 in 2006. However, the overview is inaccurate: first-time visitors were not generally more numerous; returning visitors exceeded them in every year except 2000. The final comparison also says returning visitors were higher in the last year, which is correct, but it does not repair the misleading overview. Some figures are imprecise, such as placing first-time visitors at 8,000 in 2006 rather than about 9,300. The response is also two words below the 150-word minimum. Add a clear, accurate overview and report the main comparisons more precisely.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a basic, useful structure: an introduction, an overview, and separate paragraphs for the two visitor groups. The chronological order within each group makes the changes reasonably easy to follow, and phrases such as “By 2000” and “But then in 2008” signal time and contrast. However, the overview does not guide the reader accurately, and some linking is awkward or repetitive, including “Again then” and repeated use of “increased.” The comparison between the two series is mostly left until the final sentence, so the account reads as two separate descriptions rather than a connected comparison. Improve progression by stating the overall relationship first, then grouping the most important rises, falls, and crossover comparisons.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use enough basic vocabulary to describe movement, including “decreased,” “increased,” “rise,” and “reached,” and the reader can generally understand the intended trends. However, the range is limited and several expressions are inaccurate or unnatural for a graph report. “Proportion” is not suitable when describing visitor numbers, while “return back” is redundant and “very huge rise level” is an awkward collocation. There are also spelling errors, such as “nimber,” “wwo,” and “thhe,” which reduce accuracy. Use precise terms for quantities and trends, and vary the reporting verbs without forcing informal emphasis. For example, describe a figure as “stood at” a value or a trend as a “sharp increase.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt a mixture of simple sentences and longer clauses, and most of the main trends remain understandable. However, grammatical errors occur frequently enough to make some sentences awkward. For example, “It continuously keep increasing” has incorrect subject–verb agreement and verb form; “the number of visitor who return back” has problems with number and clause structure; and “In 2004 again ,it increased” has faulty punctuation. Tense use also shifts between past and present, as in “who return back” within a description of past data. Aim to use the past simple consistently for the period shown, check singular and plural forms, and punctuate clauses cleanly. More accurate control of these basic patterns would make your descriptions clearer.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.