Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-28

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The line graph compare the number of first visitors and returning visitors who had visited the Caryl Island between 2000 and 2008.

Overall,the graph shows the consequently impact on first time visiting and second time visiting.In addition, the returning visitors had showed positive feedback to Caryl Island. Therefore, the red line showed the highest person who had visited second time over the whole period.

To begin with, First time visitors was 8000 indiviuals who had visited,although it was gradually decrease from 2000 to 2002 and stopped at 4000 visitors.In addition, newly visitor had highly climbed up the indiviuals from 4000 and reached at 12000 visitors by the year 2008.

Moreover, Returning visitors had a significant impact that was below from first time visitors that was 3000 by the 2000 years ago, Returning visitors had jumped upto 10,000 visitors by the year 2002. In addition, slightly increase from 2004 to 2006 that is 15,000 then, minor fell down returning indiviuals that was approximately 13,500 by the year of 2008.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You cover both visitor groups and the full period, and you identify several key movements: first-time visitors fell from 8,000 to 4,000 before rising, while returning visitors climbed from 3,000 to a peak around 15,000 and then declined. The overview also recognises that returning visitors were generally the larger group. However, some details are inaccurate or unclear: first-time visitors reached about 11,800 in 2008, not 12,000 exactly, and the rise from 2004 to 2006 for returning visitors is substantial rather than slight. The overview’s claim about “positive feedback” is not supported by visitor numbers. To strengthen the response, give a clearer summary of the contrasting overall trends and report the main figures more precisely.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure, with an introduction, an overview and separate paragraphs for the two visitor groups. This gives the information an overall arrangement that is easy to follow. You also use linking expressions such as “To begin with” and “Moreover” to signal progression. However, some connections are mechanical or unclear: “Overall, the graph shows the consequently impact” does not clearly introduce a trend, and the long sentence beginning “Moreover, Returning visitors…” combines several stages without clear punctuation. Referencing such as “it” and “that” is sometimes difficult to follow. Use shorter, clearly punctuated sentences and organise each group’s changes in chronological order to make the progression smoother.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for describing movement, including “decrease,” “climbed,” “jumped” and “fell down,” and you attempt more formal expressions such as “significant impact.” However, some choices are inaccurate or unnatural for a graph description. “Positive feedback” suggests opinions rather than visitor numbers, while “the highest person” is not an appropriate way to describe the largest figure. There is also repetition of “visitors” and “individuals,” and spelling errors such as “indiviuals” reduce accuracy. Aim for precise trend language and standard collocations, for example, describing a figure as reaching a peak or a number of visitors rising. This would make your vocabulary more natural and exact.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more extended sentence forms, and the reader can generally understand the main trends. However, errors in agreement, verb forms and sentence construction occur in several places. For example, “The line graph compare” should be “compares,” and “First time visitors was” should be “First-time visitors were.” The phrase “it was gradually decrease” needs a past-tense verb form, such as “it gradually decreased.” Some sentences also run together, particularly the final paragraph, where commas join several independent ideas. Practise accurate past-tense reporting and subject–verb agreement, and use full stops to separate stages. Greater control of these patterns would make your meaning clearer.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.