Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-29

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph shows the number of first time visitors and returning visitors who visited Caryl Island from 2000 to 2008.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The presented line graph compres the number of tourist visited Caryl island between 2000 to 2008. Evidently, the first time visitores had increased significant throughout eight years time frame.

It can clearly be seen that in 2000, the number of tourist who visit first time at the island at 8000 which dramatically sink after two year at 4000tourist.However, in 2004 it again move upward suddenly at 6000 and consistently had grew in the number of holidaymarkers at 12000 in 2008.

Regarding, returning visitors was show the fluctuation in graph.In 2000 ,around 3000 tourist which steadily climed in 2002 at 10000 tourist. After four yeras the number of holiday markers reached at peak approximently 15000 then 2008 it show declined number od the tourist at 13000.

Overall, the first time visitors has see inclined trend whereas retuninh visitors had declined trend in 2008.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify both visitor groups and report several key movements, including the first-time visitors’ fall from about 8,000 to 4,000 and the returning visitors’ rise to a peak before declining. However, the overview is not fully accurate: first-time visitors do not increase throughout the period, since they fall sharply at the start, and returning visitors do not show an overall decline from 2000 to 2008. Some details are also incomplete or imprecise; for example, the first-time figure in 2008 is about 11,800, not 12,000, while the returning figure is about 13,400. The response is 142 words, below the required 150, and this limits the opportunity to report the trends clearly and fully. Add a more balanced overview and a little more precise comparison.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, a paragraph for each visitor group, and a concluding overview. This makes the main subject and sequence of years generally easy to follow. Linking expressions such as “However,” “After four years,” and “Overall” help connect points, although some transitions are awkward or mechanically applied, as in “Regarding, returning visitors…” The final overview also repeats earlier information without clearly summarising the contrasting overall patterns. Improve progression by grouping the main comparisons—for example, the early fall in first-time visitors against the sharp rise in returning visitors—and use clear sentence boundaries and reference. This would make the organisation more cohesive while retaining the useful paragraph structure already present.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use some relevant vocabulary for describing trends, including “dramatically,” “steadily,” “peak,” and “declined,” and the reader can usually understand the intended meaning. However, the range is limited and several word-choice, spelling, and collocation errors reduce precision: “holidaymarkers” is not appropriate for visitor numbers, “sink” is too informal for a graph description, and “inclined trend” does not clearly express an increase. There are also repeated misspellings, including “compres,” “visitores,” and “climed.” Choose standard, precise trend language and check spelling carefully. For instance, describe figures as “rose,” “fell,” or “reached a peak,” and use “visitors” consistently rather than switching to “tourists” and “holidaymakers.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and more developed sentences, including a contrast introduced by “However” and a time clause beginning “After four years.” Nevertheless, grammatical errors are frequent and sometimes make relationships between ideas difficult to follow. Examples include “the number … at 8000,” “it again move upward,” and “returning visitors was show,” where sentence structure, verb forms, and agreement are not controlled. Articles and prepositions are also often missing or inaccurate, as in “between 2000 to 2008” and “reached at peak.” Punctuation and spacing need attention too, particularly where sentences run together. Practise complete subject–verb sentences in the past tense, such as “The figure fell to 4,000 in 2002,” before adding more complex clauses.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.