Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-08-19
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
We no longer need to have animals kept in zoos, so zoos should be closed.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
It is often argued that keeping animals in zoos is no longer necessary and that all zoos should therefore be closed. I disagree with this opinion because zoos can protect endangered animals and educated people about wildlife.
Firstly, zoos play an important role in protecting endangrered species. Many animals are at risk because of hunting,habitat destruction and climate change.Zoos can peovide them with a safe environment and help increase their population through breeding prorammes.For exampale,some endangered species suchb as the gaint panda in zoos. Therfore, well managed zoos can contributed to the protection of wildlife.
secondly, zoos are useful for educating people,especially children,about animals and nuture.When people see animals closely,they can learn about the environment and support wild life conservation.For examplew, school students who visit a zoo can learn about endangered animals in a more practical and intresting way than simply reading about bthem in textbooks.
However, i agree that some zoos keep animals in unsuitable condition,which can cause stress and poor health.such zoos should improve their facilities and follow strict animals welfare their facilites and follow strict animals welfare rules rather than all zoos being closed.
In conclusion, although some zoos may treat animals poorly, i believe that properly managed zoos should note be closed because they help protect endanered species and species and ediucated the public about wildlife.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.0 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 6.0 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.5 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.5 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 5.0
You have clearly stated your position and addressed the prompt by providing reasons for your disagreement. However, the response is significantly under the 250-word minimum requirement, which limits your ability to fully develop your arguments. While you provide relevant points regarding conservation and education, the supporting examples are brief and lack depth. For instance, the mention of the giant panda is incomplete as a sentence. To improve, you must expand on your ideas with more detailed explanations and ensure you meet the minimum word count to allow for a more comprehensive discussion of the topic.
Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.0
The essay is organized into logical paragraphs, each with a clear focus. You use basic cohesive devices such as 'Firstly', 'Secondly', 'However', and 'In conclusion' to signal the progression of your argument. While the structure is clear, the flow is occasionally interrupted by mechanical errors and repetitive phrasing, such as the accidental repetition of 'their facilities and follow strict animals welfare rules' in the third paragraph. To reach a higher band, focus on using a wider variety of linking words and ensure that your sentences are connected more fluidly without unnecessary repetition.
Lexical Resource — Band 5.5
Your vocabulary is adequate for the task, allowing you to convey your main points effectively. You use topic-specific terms like 'endangered species', 'habitat destruction', and 'wildlife conservation'. However, there are several spelling errors throughout the text, such as 'endangrered', 'peovide', 'prorammes', 'exampale', 'gaint', and 'ediucated'. These errors are frequent enough to be noticeable. To improve, focus on proofreading your work to catch these slips and try to incorporate a slightly wider range of academic collocations to demonstrate more precision in your word choice.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 5.5
You demonstrate an ability to use a mix of simple and complex sentence structures. However, there are frequent grammatical errors, including issues with subject-verb agreement ('well managed zoos can contributed'), missing articles, and punctuation errors (e.g., missing spaces after commas and periods). Some sentences are also incomplete or syntactically awkward, such as 'some endangered species suchb as the gaint panda in zoos.' To improve, focus on basic sentence construction, ensure subject-verb consistency, and pay closer attention to punctuation and spacing, which are essential for clarity in formal writing.
See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.