Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-09-20

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

We no longer need to have animals kept in zoos, so zoos should be closed.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The question of whether zoological parks have become obsolete and should be permanently closed is a subject of intense debate. While opponents argue that keeping wild animals in captivity is inherently cruel, proponents believe that modern zoos play an indispensable role in wildlife conservation. This essay will discuss both viewpoints before concluding that conservation-oriented zoos remain necessary.On the one hand, critics of zoos raise valid ethical concerns regarding animal welfare. Confining wide-ranging predators or migratory species to restricted artificial enclosures severely compromises their physical and psychological well-being. This confinement often triggers "zoochosis," a form of psychological distress characterized by repetitive behaviors like pacing. Furthermore, opponents point out that digital media and high-definition documentaries now offer comprehensive educational alternatives, making it unnecessary to keep live animals confined purely for human entertainment.On the other hand, supporters argue that accredited zoos are vital weapons against the global biodiversity crisis. Many modern institutions have shifted their focus from public amusement to rigorous scientific research and preservation. Through meticulously managed breeding programs, zoos maintain critical genetic reservoirs for endangered species. Animals like the California condor were saved from extinction primarily through captive breeding and subsequent reintroduction. Additionally, ticket sales provide substantial financial backing for field conservation projects that protect natural habitats worldwide.In conclusion, while the historical model of exploiting confined animals solely for entertainment is ethically indefensible, completely abolishing zoos would harm global conservation. The optimal approach is to support accredited, non-profit institutions that prioritize species preservation and animal welfare over profit.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The student addresses all parts of the prompt, discussing both sides of the debate regarding zoos and presenting a clear position that conservation-oriented zoos remain necessary. Ideas are well-extended and supported with relevant examples, such as 'the California condor' and references to 'zoochosis.' However, a critical limitation is the word count: the response contains 247 words, falling just short of the 250-word minimum. This minor negative constraint breach prevents the task response from achieving a higher band. Nevertheless, the position is fully articulated and developed throughout the essay. Band score: 6.5.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay demonstrates clear logical organisation and progression throughout. Each paragraph has a distinct focus: an introduction with a clear thesis, a well-developed body paragraph addressing the counter-argument about animal welfare, a second body paragraph detailing the conservation benefits of modern zoos, and a concise concluding summary. Cohesive devices such as 'On the one hand,' 'On the other hand,' 'Furthermore,' and 'Additionally' are used effectively to guide the reader through the arguments. Paragraphing is used logically and appropriately. Band score: 7.0.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.5

The student displays a sufficient and flexible range of vocabulary suited to an academic essay. Less common lexical items are used effectively and demonstrate good awareness of collocation, such as 'obsolete,' 'indispensable role,' 'biodiversity crisis,' and 'genetic reservoirs.' Word choice is generally precise, with accurate spelling and appropriate academic tone throughout. Although there are a few minor slips in collocation or phrasing, the vocabulary successfully conveys sophisticated ideas without impeding communication. Band score: 7.0.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 7.5

The writer demonstrates a strong control of grammatical structures, successfully employing a wide variety of complex sentences containing dependent clauses, participial phrases, and conditional ideas (e.g., 'Confining wide-ranging predators or migratory species to restricted artificial enclosures severely compromises...'). The majority of sentences are completely error-free, and punctuation is handled with a high degree of accuracy. Minor errors are virtually absent, placing this performance comfortably at a high band level for grammar. Band score: 8.0.

See this exact question answered at other band scores — the same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.