Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer
Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-01
IELTS Writing Task 2 question
We no longer need to have animals kept in zoos, so zoos should be closed.
Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Student answer (Band 5.5)
In today's modern society, few individuals believe that they do not have to kept animal in zoos, likewise they argue that zoos should be no longer maintained and should be closed. I completely disagree with this point of view because it will increase risk of life and safety.
To commence with, keeping animals in zoos can enable us to see different kinds of animals in zoos without any hasitation and difficulties. To elaborate further, maintaining zoos should provide us an opportunity to explore new animals and pets especially it has beneficial for children and adults who can not visit forest to see such kinds of different animals. Secondly, Kepping animals in zoos can offer a significante amount of advantages fro researcher to conduct distinct types of research on various animals without pecking it on forests. Hence, kept animals in zoos can facilitate us to easily access different kinds of animals to careed out new state of the art researchs.
Furthermore, by closing zoos can make many more obstacles such as risk of life and safety from animals which have released from zoos. To explanate on this, compeletly closing public zoos can increase the risk of our life because whenever these animals get outside from their homes then they will definitely cause our nature and human beings. As a result, safety must be required to keep ourseleve safe from such kinds of animals which cause harm to us like tigers, dogs, monkeys and so on. Moreover, when the zoos are completely closed then the process of conducting new research on different kinds of animals will be make far more difficult.
In conclusion, in our advanced scoiety zoos play a very vital role by providing esay access to reseachers and entertainment for kinds, youngster, and adults. Consequently, completely closing public zoos can badly cause our life, and limit safety from such kinds of animals as well as the lack of scientific research conduction.
AI examiner evaluation
| Criterion | Band |
|---|---|
| Task Achievement / Task Response | 5.5 |
| Coherence and Cohesion | 5.5 |
| Lexical Resource | 5.0 |
| Grammatical Range and Accuracy | 5.0 |
| Overall | 5.5 |
Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5
The response addresses the prompt by taking a clear position against closing zoos, supporting it with reasons such as educational opportunities and scientific research. However, the ideas are presented in a limited and under-developed manner. For instance, the argument regarding research lacks specific elaboration or concrete examples, relying instead on repetitive assertions about accessing animals easily. Furthermore, some arguments drift into odd or unsupported claims, such as the idea that closing zoos would cause widespread danger from released animals roaming freely. While the main stance is clear, the overall development of ideas remains restricted, keeping the task response at a partial level of fulfillment.
Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5
The essay displays some organizational structure with a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. However, there is a lack of clear overall progression, and the logical flow between sentences is occasionally hindered by mechanical or repetitive use of cohesive devices. Transitional phrases such as 'To commence with', 'To elaborate further', and 'Secondly' are used to signal structure, but referencing within sentences is sometimes unclear, such as the ambiguous pronoun use in 'especially it has beneficial'. Paragraphing is attempted, but the grouping of ideas lacks smooth transitions, resulting in a somewhat disjointed progression of thought throughout the text.
Lexical Resource: Band 5.0
The vocabulary used is limited but minimally adequate to convey the basic message. There are noticeable errors in word choice, spelling, and word formation that occasionally cause difficulty for the reader. Examples include spelling mistakes like 'Kepping' and 'significante', as well as awkward word formations and collocations such as 'pecking it on forests', 'careed out', and 'reseachers'. The writer attempts some less common vocabulary items like 'state of the art', but inaccurate usage and slips in word forms restrict the lexical range and precision needed for a higher score.
Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0
The writing demonstrates a limited range of sentence structures, with frequent reliance on basic patterns and faulty attempts at complex sentences. There are numerous grammatical errors involving verb forms, tenses, subject-verb agreement, and articles. Examples of structural and grammatical inaccuracies include 'do not have to kept animal', 'closing zoos can make many more obstacles', 'will definitely cause our nature', and 'research on different kinds of animals will be make far more difficult'. These frequent errors persist throughout the text and can cause some difficulty and hesitation for the reader.
See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.
Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.