Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-05

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

We no longer need to have animals kept in zoos, so zoos should be closed.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Nowadays, many people believe that we should not keep animals in zoos, so zoos should be closed, while others believe that animals are safe in zoos. I completely disagree with notion that we no longer need to have animals kept in zoos.

The first reason behind this is threat for animals. To elaborate, if animals not be kept in zoos their lives will be in danger because there are some species who are safe in zoos instead of forests. For instance, birds species because to have a beautiful bird has become a trend in many countries and hunters are catching such birds for sell but it will affect the biodiversity. Moreover, there are many species who extinct completely in forests but with the help of zoos they are safe such as Kakapo, a particular species among the owl family.

In addition, zoos are very beneficial for education purpose. To explain, zoos allows people to learn about animals, especially children because in forests we can not get the infotmation about animals but in zoos information boards also available which can be benefit for children. Zoos can provide better environment and breeding programms, scientists also can research on animals with help of zoos.

Thus it can be concluded that zoos should not be closed because it can help individuals also learn about animals, whereas Governments should make sure animals are kept in suitable conditions and that zoos focus on conservation rather than entertainment.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

The response addresses all parts of the task by presenting a clear position on whether zoos should be closed, supporting the stance with relevant ideas such as animal safety, conservation, and educational benefits. However, some ideas are under-developed or lack full elaboration. For example, the mention of the Kakapo is a relevant specific example, but the explanation of broader conservation efforts remains somewhat brief. Furthermore, the length requirement was not met: the response contains 231 words, falling short of the 250-word minimum, with 10 words copied from the task prompt not counted. To reach a higher band, the writer needs to extend and support all main points more thoroughly while fully satisfying the minimum word count.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response presents a coherent overall arrangement with a clear position stated in the introduction and reinforced in the conclusion. Paragraphing is used to separate main ideas, such as threats to animals in the wild versus educational purposes. However, cohesion is sometimes mechanical or faulty, with cohesive devices like 'To elaborate,' 'To explain,' and 'Thus' feeling slightly formulaic. Additionally, referencing and transitions between sentences occasionally lack smoothness, as seen in the transition from breeding programs to scientific research within the third body paragraph. To progress further, the writer should employ a wider and more flexible variety of cohesive devices organically and ensure seamless logical progression between sentences.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

The vocabulary used is adequate for the task, successfully communicating the writer's arguments regarding wildlife conservation and education. The student attempts less common vocabulary such as 'biodiversity,' 'species,' and 'breeding programms,' demonstrating a reasonable breadth of topic-specific terms. However, there are some noticeable word choice and spelling inaccuracies, such as 'programms,' 'infotmation,' and awkward phrasing like 'birds species' instead of 'bird species' or 'for sell' instead of 'for sale.' These errors do not impede communication, but they restrict the score. To achieve a higher band, the writer should improve precision in word choice, refine collocations, and eliminate minor spelling slips when using less common lexical items.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The response displays a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, attempting various clauses to express ideas about animal protection and education. There are some grammar and punctuation errors present, such as missing auxiliary verbs or articles in conditional structures ('if animals not be kept in zoos'), incorrect prepositions ('for education purpose' instead of 'for educational purposes'), and run-on tendencies in complex sentences. Nevertheless, these errors rarely impede communication and the meaning remains clear throughout. To move up to the next band, the writer must demonstrate greater control over complex sentence patterns and produce a higher frequency of error-free sentences, particularly regarding verb forms, subject-verb agreement, and article usage.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.