Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-08

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

We no longer need to have animals kept in zoos, so zoos should be closed.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

Many people believe that there is no advantage of caging the animals in zoos as people do not prefer to visit zoos anymore as compared to the ancient time. Therefore, we should closed them. I completely disagree with the above statement because zoos are a great source of education and conservation.

To begin with, children and adults can learn abundant things about endangered and extinct species. It helps the children to raise a curiosity in science and history of animals. For instance, zoos can be advantageous for those who wanted to pursue their study in biology as it can helps to generate thought and connection while visiting zoos and experience the physical structure of animals. Moreover, zoos not only provides larger benefits to labour market but also contribute in economic growth of the country while taking charges from the general public to visit in zoos.

Furthermore, zoos facilitate many endangered species whose conservation are the most pressing concern. There are many species who are on the verge of extinction because they do not have a proper habitat in this zoos plays a pivotal role to protect these species. For example, many zoos aid vultures to provide a suitable environment as these species was declining day by day.

In contrast, some zoos should be closed because they were not providing a suitable condition and environment to animals. There were some zoos who caged the animals in small places which prohibit their movements and functions properly. However, the modern zoos are different in which zookeeper are qualified and fulfill all the basic amenities for protecting animals.

In a conclusion, although zoos have some disadvantages and not good for the welfare of animals, I believe that it is beneficial for conservation of endangered and extinct species as well as other animals so that the upcoming generation can be benefitted too.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

Your position is clear from the introduction: you disagree with closing zoos, and the conclusion restates this view. You address the central issue with relevant reasons, especially education and the protection of endangered species, and the vulture example helps illustrate conservation. The paragraph acknowledging poor conditions also shows awareness of the opposing view. However, some points are less fully developed: the claim that zoos benefit the labour market and national economy is asserted without explanation, and the response to inadequate animal welfare relies on a broad contrast between older and modern zoos. To strengthen the argument, explain how specific conservation programmes work and support claims about economic or educational benefits with clearer examples. The response already has a clear position and relevant support, but fuller development would make it more convincing.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, two paragraphs supporting zoos, a paragraph considering a drawback, and a conclusion. Sequencing is generally logical, and signposts such as “To begin with,” “Furthermore,” and “In contrast” help readers follow the argument. The main weakness is that some links between ideas are unclear or mechanical. For example, the sentence beginning “There are many species who are on the verge of extinction” runs into the point about zoos without a clear grammatical or logical connection. References such as “these species” and “these zoos” can also be ambiguous. Use clearer sentence boundaries and make each paragraph’s central point explicit; vary transitions by showing the precise relationship between claims rather than relying mainly on standard signposting.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of topic vocabulary, including “endangered,” “conservation,” “habitat,” “extinction,” and “pivotal role,” which makes the subject clear. There are also attempts at more formal phrasing, such as “the most pressing concern.” However, some word choices and collocations are inaccurate or unnatural, including “raise a curiosity,” “taking charges,” “basic amenities for protecting animals,” and “ancient time.” These do not usually prevent understanding, but they reduce precision and naturalness. Aim to learn vocabulary in common word partnerships and check whether a phrase fits its context. More precise terms for animal welfare, breeding programmes, and public education would also help you express the argument with greater flexibility.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a concession beginning “although” and a contrast introduced by “However.” Meaning is generally understandable, but some grammatical errors remain across the response. Examples include “we should closed them” instead of a base-form verb after “should,” “it can helps” instead of “it can help,” and agreement errors in “zoos not only provides” and “conservation are.” The sentence about species nearing extinction also lacks a clear boundary between clauses, making its structure difficult to follow. Review subject–verb agreement, modal verb patterns, and sentence boundaries, then proofread for these recurring issues. Greater control of these forms would make your complex sentences clearer and more consistently accurate.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.