Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Academic Practice Accelerator · 2026-10-30

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

We no longer need to have animals kept in zoos, so zoos should be closed.

Do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

Nowadays, zoos prevent the rare bride of animals and prvovides better facilities than they have in forests. Some people believe that the zoos not need to kept animals and because of that the zoos might be close soon. But, in my parspective zoo helps to save wildlife and also provide educational information about animals to next generation.

Globally, organizations open zoos for priventing rare species of animals such as mountain tigers or wolfs. In studys find out that the animals are no more safe in forests or any region. Because, people killing them and sell their skins or teeths and body parts. Due to that percentage of tigers and wolfs are deficult to find. While, zoos prevent that rare bread animals in the specfic area and provide required foods and environments. As result, animals feel safe and zoo owners set ticket price reasonabel, so students afford that and often visit there for studying wildlife.

However, some people argue that there is not requirement for kept animals in zoos, and due to that zoos business experieance downfall. At some point I agree this because its hard to keep maintain zoo fecilities, rent, or employees salerys. But, in many countries like in India government provide funds for develop better fecilities for wild life. For example, Vantara the biggest zoo in Jamnager, it has ot of species there and even the price of tickets are very low and even they also provide funds and experts to another zoo owners for helping them to develop better living area for animals.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you disagree with closing zoos, arguing that they protect endangered wildlife and educate young people. The discussion of poaching and the example of government support in India are relevant, and you acknowledge the opposing view about the cost of maintaining zoos. However, the response develops the conservation argument more fully than the educational one, which is mentioned mainly in the introduction. The point about ticket prices and students is also asserted rather than explained, and the Vantara example would be stronger with a clearer link to why zoos should remain open. Develop each main reason with a specific explanation or example, and make the conclusion of your argument explicit.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a coherent overall arrangement: an introduction states your view, followed by a paragraph on conservation and one addressing the opposing argument. Linking expressions such as “However,” “For example,” and “Due to that” help show relationships between ideas. At times, though, connections are mechanical or unclear. For instance, “In studys find out” does not clearly identify who conducted the research, and the shift from the cost of running zoos to the Vantara example needs a more explicit explanation. The response would progress more smoothly if each paragraph began with a clear central point and then developed it in a logical sequence. A brief concluding paragraph would also reinforce the position.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You attempt topic-specific vocabulary, including “rare species,” “wildlife,” “skins,” “ticket price,” and “living area,” so the reader can generally follow your main ideas. However, the range is limited and several spelling, word-form, and collocation errors make the writing less precise, such as “rare bride,” “prventing,” “deficult to find,” and “zoo business experieance downfall.” Some choices also sound unnatural, including “required foods and environments” and “set ticket price reasonabel.” Build a more accurate set of phrases for conservation, animal welfare, and operating costs, and check spelling and word forms carefully. More precise vocabulary would help you express your arguments without relying on broad or awkward wording.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You use both simple statements and attempts at longer, connected sentences, for example, “Because, people killing them and sell their skins or teeths and body parts.” However, control of sentence structure and verb forms is uneven, and some errors make relationships between ideas difficult to follow. Examples include “the zoos not need to kept animals,” “people killing them,” and “government provide funds.” Articles and plural forms also need attention, as in “the animals are no more safe in forests” and “the price of tickets are very low.” Practise forming complete clauses with accurate subject–verb agreement and verb patterns, then check articles and singular/plural agreement. Clearer sentence boundaries will make your reasoning easier to understand.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.