Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-11-05

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the change in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

PEOPLE IN HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE OF HOUSEHOLD AND FAMILY

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The given table illustrate the information about the change in some household types in great Britain from 1971 to 2007.

overall, it is evident that the percentage of household and family types from the years 1971 to 2007 can varies change differently.

looking at the figure in greater deatil, it shows that the percentage of one person is 6 percent in 1971 and they were increased continuously and stop at 12% in 2007. While the sub-types of one-family households can also varies as years passes. The percentage of no-children in 1971 is 19% and it also increased every year and in 2007 it's closing percentage is 25%.

Furthermore, looking at the table percentage of dependent children in 1971 is 52% and in 1981 the percentage is decreased 7% and continuously decreased, and in 2007 the percentage is 36% that this record decline. when we compared the non-dependent and lone-parent percentage the percentage of non-dependent childern remain same from 1971 to 1981 and fall in value in 1991 of 1% and then also fall down and closed at 9%. But lone-parent percentage start at 4% and continuously increased in 2007 it's percentage is 12%.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

You cover the main household categories and identify several important trends: one-person households and lone-parent households rise, while households with dependent children decline. The figures you give are generally consistent with the table, including the starting and ending values for these groups. However, the overview is vague—“can varies change differently” does not clearly summarise the dominant pattern—and some details are unclear or incomplete. For example, the non-dependent-child figure rises from 10% to 11% in 1991 before falling to 9%; your account describes falls but does not clearly report that temporary increase. To strengthen the response, give a precise overview and compare the largest category with the smaller, rising groups. The response meets the required length.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and two paragraphs describing the figures. Linking expressions such as “Furthermore” and “when we compared” help signal movement between categories. However, progression within the detail paragraphs is sometimes difficult to follow, particularly where several trends are joined in one long sentence. “While the sub-types … can also varies” does not make the relationship to the previous point clear, and the final comparison combines two categories without a clean contrast. Use one focused paragraph for rising categories and another for declining categories, and make references such as “this record decline” explicit. This would make the organisation more coherent and reduce the mechanical feel of some transitions.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use relevant vocabulary for describing data, including “percentage,” “increased,” “decreased,” and “continuously,” so the reader can understand the broad trends. There is also some attempt to vary phrasing through expressions such as “looking at the figure” and “when we compared.” However, several choices are inaccurate or unnatural, including “closing percentage,” “fall down,” and “this record decline.” Spelling errors such as “deatil” and “childern” also reduce precision. Aim for standard chart language and accurate collocations, for example, “ended at,” “fell,” and “the largest decline.” A more controlled set of trend verbs and comparison phrases would make the account clearer and more appropriate to an academic report.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple statements and longer sentences, and the main figures and trends are usually understandable. However, errors in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction occur across the response. For instance, “The given table illustrate” needs subject–verb agreement, while “can varies change differently” has an incorrect verb form and an unclear structure. In “they were increased continuously,” the passive form is not appropriate for describing the figures; use “the proportion increased.” Some sentences also lack a clear grammatical connection between clauses, as in “in 2007 the percentage is 36% that this record decline.” Practise accurate past-tense reporting and build complex sentences around clear clauses. Greater control would make your range more effective.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.