Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-07-25

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the change in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

PEOPLE IN HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE OF HOUSEHOLD AND FAMILY

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The table illustrates the people in households by type of household and family in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007. The data are measured in percentages.

Overall, there was significant variation among the different household types, with couples with dependent children recorded the highest, while lone parent households showed the lowest.

It is clear from the data that one person stood at 6% in 1971, then increased doubled to about 11% in 1971, and finally rose slightly just 12% in 2007. Couples with no children represented to 19% in 1971. It then gradually rose to about 23% in 1971 and reached at 25% by 2007.

Now, turning to details, couples wiht dependent children experienced for the highest proportion about 52% in 1971, while considerably declined to about 41% in 1971 and it continued to decrease by the end of the year, whereas couple with non-dependent children household showed at 10% in 1971 and fluactuated about 11% between 1981 to 2001, it then slightly declined to about 9% by 2007. Lone parent household represented for the lowest compared to the other households throughout the period, it stood at 4% in 1971, then it rose gradually to 10% in 1991, and finally reached at 12% by 2007.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response — Band 6.0

The response provides a clear overview and selects key features from the data. However, there are significant factual errors regarding the years cited (e.g., stating 1971 twice for different data points) and some confusion in the reporting of figures. While the main trends are identified, the accuracy of the data presentation is compromised by these errors, which impacts the overall clarity of the report. To improve, ensure that the years and percentages match the source material precisely and avoid repetitive or contradictory statements.

Coherence and Cohesion — Band 6.5

The essay is logically organized into paragraphs, with an introduction, an overview, and body paragraphs. Cohesive devices such as 'Overall', 'It is clear from the data', and 'Now, turning to details' are used to guide the reader. However, the progression within paragraphs is sometimes hindered by awkward phrasing and repetitive sentence structures. The use of referencing is generally clear, but the flow is occasionally interrupted by the factual inaccuracies mentioned in the task achievement section. Improving the variety of linking words would enhance the overall cohesion.

Lexical Resource — Band 6.0

The vocabulary is generally adequate for the task, with attempts to use descriptive verbs like 'fluctuated', 'declined', and 'increased'. However, there are several instances of awkward word choice and collocation errors, such as 'represented to 19%' and 'experienced for the highest proportion'. Spelling errors like 'wiht' and 'fluactuated' also occur. To reach a higher band, focus on using collocations correctly (e.g., 'accounted for' instead of 'represented for') and ensure precise usage of reporting verbs.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy — Band 6.0

The response uses a mix of simple and complex sentence structures, but there is a high frequency of grammatical errors. Issues include incorrect preposition usage ('reached at 25%'), subject-verb agreement problems, and tense inconsistencies. For example, 'considerably declined' lacks a subject, and 'the end of the year' is an incorrect reference to the timeline. While the meaning is generally understandable, the frequency of these errors is noticeable and occasionally impedes the flow of the text. More attention to basic sentence construction and proofreading is required.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.