Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-09-30

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the change in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

PEOPLE IN HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE OF HOUSEHOLD AND FAMILY

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The given table chart illustrates the details about the replace in few household types in Great Britain between 1971 and 2007. The units are measured in percentages.

At a glance, it is evident that the trend showed fluctuations in all years. Departent children had depicted the highest percentage as compared to others. Additionally, the lowest ration was in lone parent.

To commence with, after analysing the chart it can be clearly seen that around 6% household was covered by one person in 1971 which gradually increased in all years and finally reached at 12% in 2007. Furthermore, there was a different of about 6% in term of no children between 1971 and 2007, whereas, in 2007 household was higher with 25%.

Probing ahead to further details, individuals in households by non dependent children was of 10% which remaind constant in 1981. Afterthat, it declined in next years and stoped at 9% in final year. Moreover, lone parent started at 4% in 1971 which rose up from 4% to 10% percent in 1991 and stable in next years at 12%. The percentage of dependent children slightly reduced in all years from 52% to 36%.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

The response covers all parts of the task by selecting and reporting the main features of the table, such as highlighting that dependent children formed the highest percentage at 52% in 1971 before dropping to 36%, and noting the upward trend for one-person households and lone parents. An overview is attempted, stating that the trends showed fluctuations across years and correctly identifying the extremes. However, some details are slightly imprecise or under-developed, such as stating that 'trend showed fluctuations in all years' when several categories followed steady directional paths, such as the gradual rise of one-person households or the continuous decline of dependent children. Overall, the task is addressed adequately, satisfying the requirements for this level.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a coherent overall arrangement and follows a logical structure, moving from an introductory overview into body paragraphs detailing specific categories. Paragraphing is attempted to group ideas, though paragraph breaks feel somewhat arbitrary or choppy. Cohesive devices are used to signal progression, such as 'To commence with', 'Furthermore', and 'Probing ahead to further details'. However, some cohesive links feel mechanical or awkward in context, and referencing is occasionally unclear, such as the abrupt transition between sentences in the final paragraph. Progression lacks complete smoothness, meaning ideas do not always flow effortlessly from one to the next.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

The student uses an adequate range of vocabulary for the task, successfully incorporating terms related to data reporting such as 'percentages', 'gradually increased', and 'declined'. However, there are notable word-choice errors, lexical inaccuracies, and typographical mistakes throughout the text, such as 'replace' instead of 'change', 'Departent' instead of 'Dependent', 'ration' instead of 'ratio', 'different' instead of 'difference', and 'stoped' instead of 'stopped'. Less common vocabulary is attempted with limited success, and these frequent slips occasionally draw attention, restricting the vocabulary score to a basic level.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

The writer attempts a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, utilizing structures like relative clauses and comparative phrases such as 'as compared to others' and 'whereas, in 2007 household was higher with 25%'. However, grammatical accuracy is inconsistent. There are frequent errors in subject-verb agreement and article use, such as 'around 6% household was covered' and 'in term of no children', as well as tense inconsistencies and awkward prepositional phrases like 'remaind constant in 1981'. While these errors rarely impede overall communication, they occur often enough to prevent the writing from achieving a higher band.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.