Band 4.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 4.5 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-10-07

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the change in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

PEOPLE IN HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE OF HOUSEHOLD AND FAMILY

Student answer (Band 4.5)

The table provides information the modify in fewer household kinds in best British from 1971 to 2007.

There are different types of household work in this table such as one person, couple, no children and dependent children.

Overall, there were maximum household sorts in this table, those were an important role in various periods like that, 1971, 1981, 2001 and 2007.

In the beginning, the role of one person was began lower level in 1971 in addition, it was literally up level In 1981, 2001 was 11%, 12% while its was minimum higher around 12%. The second type of household works and family, one-family household was peak 19% and approximately 25% in 2007.

However, the types of no children had not work in the past 1971, 1981, 2001, and 2007. Dependent children was commenced at highest 52% in 1971 and this types was decreased in 1981, 1991, and 2007.

In conclusion, the table described the types of household in great Britain from 1971 to 2007.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 4.0

You identify the table’s topic and mention several relevant categories, including one-person households and dependent children. However, the account only minimally reports the data and does not give a clear, accurate overview of the main changes. For example, you say one-person households were 11% in 2001, when the table shows 12% (11% was in 1991), and the statement that “no children had not work” does not describe the rise from 19% to 25%. The “one-family household” figure is also confused with the couple-with-no-children category. To improve, summarise the major trends accurately: dependent-child households fell, while one-person, childless-couple and lone-parent households generally rose; include selected figures to support these comparisons.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 4.5

The response has a basic paragraph structure, with an introduction, an attempted overview, body paragraphs and a conclusion. Some sequencing is also signalled by phrases such as “In the beginning,” “However” and “In conclusion.” Nevertheless, the progression is difficult to follow because the overview is vague and several sentences do not connect their ideas clearly. For instance, “Overall, there were maximum household sorts” does not identify a meaningful pattern, while the paragraph about one-person households shifts abruptly to “one-family household.” The contrast introduced by “However” is also unclear. Organise the body around clear trends, and use linking words only where the relationship between the data is explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

You use some task-related vocabulary, including “household,” “dependent children,” “decreased” and “percentage,” so the topic is recognisable. However, the range is basic and several inaccurate or unnatural expressions make the data difficult to understand. Examples include “the modify in fewer household kinds,” “household work,” “peak 19%” and “had not work.” These are not suitable collocations for describing a table. Use precise, familiar reporting language rather than forcing unusual phrases: for example, “the proportion of one-person households increased” or “the figure for dependent-child households declined.” Also distinguish the category “couples with no children” from the broader label “one-family households.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

You attempt a few longer sentences and use past-tense forms, but grammatical control is inconsistent, and errors frequently make relationships between figures unclear. For example, “the role of one person was began lower level” has an incorrect verb construction, while “2001 was 11%, 12%” lacks a clear subject and gives the figures an unclear relationship. In “this types was decreased,” the demonstrative, noun and verb do not agree, and “its was minimum higher” is also structurally unclear. Most sentences rely on simple patterns, with limited accurate complex structure. Practise building clear comparisons with a subject, verb and figure—for example, “The proportion rose from 6% in 1971 to 12% in 2001”—and check agreement, articles and tense.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.