Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-10-11

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the change in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

PEOPLE IN HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE OF HOUSEHOLD AND FAMILY

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The table provides information regarding the the types of households in Great Britain across a few decades from 1971 to 2007. The numbers here indicate the percentage of a particular type of household among all the types.

Overall , the percentage of most of the types of households have increased. However, the percentage of couples with non-dependent children and couples with dependent children have decreased over time.

The number of One person households increased from 6% in 1971 to 12% in 2007. While, the number of households with Lone parent also recorded a significant increase from 4% in 1971 to 12 % in 2007. In addition to that, number of households having Couples without chidren grew significantly from 19% in 1971 to 25 % in 2007.

The percentage of households with Couples having Dependent children dropped from 52% in 1971 to 36% in 2007 showing the maximum change. Meanwhile, Number of Couples with Non-dependent children increased from 10% in 1971 to 11% in 1991. However , that number dropped to 9% in 2007.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.5

You identify the main broad pattern: one-person, childless-couple and lone-parent households rose, while households with dependent children declined. The key figures for these groups are accurately reported, including the fall from 52% to 36%, the largest change. This gives the response a clear overview and relevant comparisons. However, the overview says “most” household types increased without distinguishing the slight rise and subsequent fall in non-dependent-child households; the detail later partly clarifies this, but the trend is not fully precise. Also, describing the 10% to 11% movement as an increase is accurate, though the small change could be better contextualised against the later decline. More precise synthesis of the less prominent category would strengthen coverage.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introduction, an overview, and two paragraphs grouping the rising and falling categories. This makes the main comparisons easy to follow, and linking expressions such as “Overall,” “In addition to that,” and “Meanwhile” help signal relationships. The progression is generally logical, though some transitions feel mechanical or are punctuated awkwardly, as in “While, the number…” and “However , that number…”. The overview also groups the non-dependent-child category with the general increase, then the final paragraph explains its mixed pattern, so the relationship between summary and detail could be clearer. Use fewer formulaic connectors and make each paragraph’s organising principle more explicit.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of task-related vocabulary, including “percentage,” “increased,” “dropped,” “significant increase,” and “maximum change,” and the meaning remains clear. There are attempts to vary descriptions of trends, but some phrasing is repetitive or imprecise: “number” is used for percentages, and “types of households” recurs frequently. Several word-choice and spelling slips reduce accuracy, notably “chidren” and the awkward “households having Couples.” Capitalisation is also inconsistent for category names. Aim for more precise collocations and consistent terminology, such as “the proportion of households” and “couples with dependent children.” This would make the description more natural and exact without requiring unnecessarily complex vocabulary.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple statements and more complex forms, including the contrast introduced by “However” and the participial phrase “showing the maximum change.” Most sentences communicate the intended comparisons, but some grammatical errors remain. For example, “the percentage … have increased” has a subject–verb agreement problem, and “While, the number…” is an incomplete subordinate clause when punctuated as a separate sentence. Articles are missing in “In addition to that, number of households,” while spacing and punctuation are inconsistent around commas and percent signs. The opening also repeats “the” in “regarding the the types.” Check agreement, article use, and sentence boundaries during revision, while retaining the range of sentence forms you already attempt.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.