Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-10-13

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the change in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

PEOPLE IN HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE OF HOUSEHOLD AND FAMILY

PEOPLE IN HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE OF HOUSEHOLD AND FAMILY

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The provided table illustrates the transformation in seven different types of groups in household in the United Kingdon between 1971 to 2007.

Overall, it is evident that the dependent children recorded for the highest propotion throughout the year, while one person and lone parnet accounded the smallest in the first years. Additionally, except dependent and non-dependent children other three categoires showed an upward trend.

Looking at the bar more closely, there was 52% dependent childrens in family in 1971, however it declined steadily in the following years. Similarly, although non-dependent young adults had 10% in the initial year, it also dropped its percentage until final year 2007, and reached at 9%.

On the other hand, lone parent and one person was the least rate in 1971 with 4% and 6% respectively, which witnessed a gradual rise and attained a same percentage 12 in 2007. Likewise, no children aslo experienced a significant incline from 19 to 25. Meanwhile, the ratio of one-family households and coupe never collected since 1971.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.5
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource5.5
Grammatical Range and Accuracy5.5
Overall5.5

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify the main contrast: dependent-child households were the largest category and declined, while several other categories rose. You also report key figures accurately, including the fall from 52% to 36%, the rise in one-person households from 6% to 12%, and the increase in couples with no children from 19% to 25%. However, the overview is partly unclear: one-person households and lone-parent households were not both among the smallest categories throughout the early years, and the table does not show that the other three categories all rose, since non-dependent children fluctuated before falling. The final sentence also misreads the layout: couple households are divided into subcategories, not missing data. Select and compare the main trends more precisely.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a recognisable structure, moving from an introduction and overview to two paragraphs describing contrasting trends. Linking expressions such as “Overall,” “Similarly,” and “On the other hand” help signal relationships between points. However, some connections are not fully logical: “Similarly” groups the two child categories even though one falls steadily and the other changes only slightly, while “Meanwhile” introduces no clear contrast. The final sentence about households that “never collected” is difficult to follow and interrupts the comparison. Improve progression by grouping categories according to their trends, and use linking words only when their relationship is clear. More precise references to the categories would also make the paragraph flow easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You use a reasonable range of task-related vocabulary, including “declined steadily,” “gradual rise,” “percentage,” and “attained,” and the reader can generally understand the intended comparisons. However, several word-choice, collocation, and spelling problems reduce precision: “transformation in seven different types of groups in household” is awkward, “the bar” does not describe the table, and “never collected” does not convey that the categories are shown as subgroups. There are also noticeable spelling errors, including “United Kingdon,” “propotion,” “parnet,” and “categoires.” Aim for accurate, natural phrases such as “household types,” “the table,” and “accounted for,” and check spelling carefully. This would make your vocabulary more reliable and precise.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You attempt a mix of simple and complex sentences, including clauses introduced by “while,” “although,” and “which.” The overall meaning is usually recoverable, but some grammatical errors remain, particularly in agreement, articles, plurals, and sentence construction. For example, “the dependent children recorded for the highest proportion” needs a verb such as “accounted,” and “lone parent and one person was” should use a plural verb. Phrases such as “between 1971 to 2007” and “reached at 9%” also show problems with grammatical patterns and prepositions. In “there was 52% dependent childrens,” the structure and plural form are inaccurate. Use a consistent past-tense reporting pattern and check subject–verb agreement and sentence completeness.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.