Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-10-13

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the change in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

PEOPLE IN HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE OF HOUSEHOLD AND FAMILY

Student answer (Band 5.5)

The table depicts changes in the household types in Great Britain spanning from 1971 to 2007.

Overall, over a period of 36 years variations in structure of household and family in Great Britain is seen with increase in the number of family members.

As Seen in the year 1971 houses having a single person in the family was 6 which doubled by the year 2007 showing the preference of people opting for a individual lifestyle. Families with no children increased from 19% to 25%. a depriaction was seen in the percentage of dependent children showing childrenfocussing on become more independent.

The similar trend was also appreciated with a slight decrease in the non dependent children, though the values wre not appreciable. The percentage of lone parents increased from 4% to 12%, depicting children migrating from their home place

On the whole a trend towards small and nuclear family is observed with a increase in lone parents percentage.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify several important movements, including the rise in one-person households (6% to 12%), couples without children (19% to 25%), and lone-parent households (4% to 12%). However, the overview is unclear and includes an unsupported claim that the “number of family members” increased; the table reports household-type percentages, and the strongest overall pattern is the decline in households with dependent children, from 52% to 36%. The explanation that this reflects children becoming independent, and the claim about children migrating from home, are not demonstrated by the data. The non-dependent category also fell overall from 10% to 9%, after a small rise. Select the main trends accurately and avoid assigning causes the table cannot establish.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.5

The response has a recognisable structure: an introduction, an overview, and paragraphs describing several categories. This gives the reader some organisation, and phrases such as “Overall” and “On the whole” signal summary points. However, the progression is not consistently clear: the overview’s reference to an increase in family members conflicts with the later emphasis on smaller families, and the final summary largely repeats an earlier claim. Connections between data and interpretation are also weak, particularly where the figures are followed by explanations about lifestyle or migration. Group the main increases together and contrast them with the decline in dependent-child households, using clear links between comparisons rather than repeated general statements.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-relevant vocabulary, including “percentage,” “dependent children,” “lone parents,” and “nuclear family,” and the reader can generally identify the categories being discussed. However, several word choices and collocations are inaccurate or awkward, such as “a depriaction,” “trend was also appreciated,” and “preference of people opting for a individual lifestyle.” Spelling errors, including “wre” and “depriaction,” also reduce precision. Some expressions introduce meanings not supported by the table, such as “children migrating from their home place.” Aim for straightforward, accurate language for describing data: use verbs such as “rose,” “fell,” and “remained stable,” and refer to “households” rather than “houses” when describing the categories.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

The response attempts both simple and more extended sentence forms, for example, “Families with no children increased from 19% to 25%” and the sentence beginning “The similar trend was also appreciated…”. However, errors occur frequently in sentence construction and agreement, sometimes making relationships between ideas difficult to follow. In the overview, “variations in structure … is seen” has a plural subject with a singular verb, while “a increase” and “a individual” show article errors. The sentence beginning “As Seen in the year 1971” is also awkwardly formed, and punctuation and capitalisation are inconsistent. Build clear subject–verb sentences around each comparison, check articles and agreement, and use full stops to separate data reporting from interpretation.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.