Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-10-17

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the change in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

PEOPLE IN HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE OF HOUSEHOLD AND FAMILY

Student answer (Band 5.0)

THE GIVEN CHART ILLUSTRATES THE PEOPLE OF BRITAIN LIVED IN HOUSE AND TYPES OF HOUSEHOLD IN 50 YEARS.

TO ANALYZING THE OF LAYMEN, IN 1971 THE PERCENTAGE OF HOUSEHOLD IN SINGLE PERSON WAS GREDUALLY INCREASED OVER THE PERIODS AND WAS ROSE FROM 6% TO 12%.HOWEVER,THE COUPLE WAS BEAING WITH DEPENDENT CHILDREN 52% IN 1971 FREQUNTLY DECREASED AROUND 14% AND FALL AT 36%.THE COUPLE WITH NON-DEPENDENT WAS QUITE SIMILLER OVER THE 50 YEAR IT WAS ABOUT 9%.THE NUMBER OF LONE PARENT ROSE DRASTICALLY FROM 4% TO 12%.IN CONTRAST, COUPLE WITH NO CHILDREN WAS 25% IN THE 2007 AND IT WAS ROSE 6% COMPARE TO 1971.

OVERALL,IN BRATIAN,COUPLE WITH DEPENDENT CHILDREN WAS SIGNIFICANTLY WENT DOWN AND IT WAS 36%.WHILE,THE NUMBER OF LONE PARENT WAS INCREASED FROM 4% TO 12

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.5

You identify several important trends, including the rise in one-person households from 6% to 12%, the fall in households with dependent children from 52% to 36%, and the increase in lone-parent households from 4% to 12%. These figures are broadly accurate, and you also mention the stable 9% figure for non-dependent children. However, the overview is brief and repeats the fall in dependent-child households rather than summarising the main pattern across the table. Some descriptions are unclear, such as “the couple was bearing with dependent children,” and the response ends without a complete final statement. It is also 23 words below the required minimum, which limits the detail and comparisons you can provide. Develop a clearer overview and explain the main contrasts more fully.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a basic structure: a description of several figures followed by a separate concluding paragraph. This gives the reader some sense of organisation, and contrast markers such as “However” and “In contrast” show an attempt to connect trends. However, progression is limited because the first paragraph moves rapidly between household categories without grouping related increases and decreases. Several links are awkward or do not clearly express the relationship between ideas, and the overview repeats information already given. The final sentence is incomplete, which weakens the ending. Organise the body around clear comparisons—for example, declining dependent-child households versus rising one-person and lone-parent households—and use linking phrases only where their relationship is clear.

Lexical Resource: Band 4.5

You use some relevant task vocabulary, including “percentage,” “dependent children,” “non-dependent,” and “lone parent,” so the topic is recognisable. However, the range is limited and many word-choice, collocation, and spelling errors make parts difficult to understand. Phrases such as “people of Britain lived in house,” “to analyzing the of laymen,” and “was bearing with dependent children” are not natural ways to describe the table. There are also misspellings such as “greadually,” “freqently,” “similler,” and “Bratian.” Aim for precise, standard expressions such as “the proportion of households,” “households comprising couples with dependent children,” and “rose steadily.” Check spelling carefully and avoid using words whose meaning you are unsure of.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 4.5

There are attempts to form longer sentences and compare trends, but control is inconsistent, and errors often make the intended meaning difficult to follow. For example, “the percentage of household in single person was gradually increased” combines an incorrect noun pattern with an unsuitable verb construction; “it was rose” also uses an incorrect passive form. Articles, plurals, and sentence boundaries are frequently problematic, as in “the couple with no children was 25% in the 2007.” The final clause, “the number of lone parent was increased from 4% to 12,” is incomplete and lacks a percent sign. Practise accurate simple trend sentences first, then combine them using controlled clauses, such as “The proportion rose from 6% to 12%.”

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.