Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-10-19

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the change in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

PEOPLE IN HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE OF HOUSEHOLD AND FAMILY

PEOPLE IN HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE OF HOUSEHOLD AND FAMILY

Student answer (Band 6.0)

The given table illutrates the difference in percentages in few household categories in great britain between 1971 and 2007. Overall, one person household type, no children and lone parents from one-family household type showed a gradual increase, while dependent children and non-dependent children recorded a decline in percentage.

One person household type stood at 6 percent in 1971 and showed a moderate rise to 12 percent in 2007. Under one-family household type, only no children and lone parents showed an increase in percentage over the period. The former from 19 percent in 1971 to 12 percent in 2007, while the later was 4 percent in 1971 and showed a gradual rise to 12 percent in 2007.

Dependent children showed a significant drop over the time as it stood at 52 percent in 1971 and fell to 36 percent in 2007, while non-dependent children increased by 1% in 1991 and resulted a steady drop to 9% in 2007.

AI examiner evaluation

CriterionBand
Task Achievement / Task Response5.0
Coherence and Cohesion6.0
Lexical Resource6.0
Grammatical Range and Accuracy6.0
Overall6.0

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You identify several important trends, including the rise in one-person households and lone-parent families and the fall in households with dependent children. However, the account is only partly accurate and the overview is incomplete: non-dependent children did not show an overall decline, rising from 10% to 11% before ending at 9%, while the overview says they recorded a decline without clarifying this fluctuation. More seriously, you report that couples with no children fell from 19% to 12%; the table shows an increase to 25%. This misreading affects a key category. To strengthen the response, check each endpoint carefully and give a clearer overview of the largest and most notable changes.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.0

The response has a clear overall arrangement: an introductory sentence and overview are followed by paragraphs describing the household categories. Linking expressions such as “Overall,” “while,” and “Under one-family household type” help signal relationships between ideas. However, the progression is somewhat mechanical, and the final paragraph groups two contrasting trends without fully clarifying the non-dependent category’s rise and subsequent fall. “The former” and “the latter” are also less clear than repeating the category names, particularly because several categories have just been mentioned. Organise the details more deliberately—for example, group the increasing categories together and then describe the declining ones—and use precise references to make comparisons easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of task-related vocabulary, including “gradual increase,” “moderate rise,” “significant drop,” and “stood at,” so the main trends are generally understandable. There are also some inaccurate or awkward choices: “difference in percentages” is less suitable than “changes in proportions,” and “resulted a steady drop” is not a natural collocation. “Household type” is repeated frequently, while “the former” and “the later” do not identify categories precisely. Spelling errors such as “illutrates” and “great britain” also reduce accuracy. Aim for precise, natural trend language and check spelling and word forms; this would make the description clearer and more fluent.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.0

You use a mix of simple and complex sentence forms, including contrast clauses with “while” and a relative clause in “categories … showed a gradual increase.” Most sentences communicate the intended meaning, but some grammatical errors remain. In “The former from 19 percent …,” the clause lacks a finite verb; write, for example, “The former rose from 19% to 25%.” The phrase “the later was 4 percent” also needs a clearer grammatical construction, such as “the latter stood at 4%.” In addition, “non-dependent children increased by 1% in 1991 and resulted a steady drop” has an unclear subject and faulty verb pattern. Use complete clauses and check that each verb has the correct subject and construction.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.