Band 6.5 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.5 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-10-21

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the change in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

PEOPLE IN HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE OF HOUSEHOLD AND FAMILY

Student answer (Band 6.5)

The table compares the proportions of people living in diffrent types of households in Great Braitain between 1971 and 2007.

Overall, households with dependent children accounted for the largest proportion throughout the period, although this figure declined considerably. In contrast, the persentage of couples without children increased, while one person households and lone parants families both became more common.

In 1971, household with dependent children represented 52%, making them the mostcommon catagory. This figure fell stedily to 47% in 1981 and 36% in 2007. By comparison, the proportion of couples without children rose from 19% in 1971 to 25%, in 2001, remaining unchanged in 2007. Households with non dependent children fluctuated slightly, increasing from 10% to 11% in 1991 before falling to 9% by the end of the period.

Meanwhile, one person households incresed from 6% in 1971 to 12% in 2001, where the figure then stabilised. Similarly, the proportion og lone parent families tripled from 4% to 12% between 1971 and 2001 and remained at this level in 2007.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 7.0

You provide a clear overview of the main pattern: dependent-child households were the largest category but declined, while couples without children, one-person households and lone-parent families generally increased. The figures you select are accurate, including the fall from 52% to 36%, the rise from 19% to 25%, and the increases to 12% for the latter two groups. You also note where figures levelled off. This is a well-supported summary of the key features. To make the coverage more complete, include the 2007 value for couples without children in the body, and clarify that the dependent-children figure fell to 39% in 2001 before reaching 36%. These are small omissions rather than misunderstandings of the data.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 7.0

The response is organised effectively into an introduction, an overview and two detail paragraphs. The progression from the largest household category to comparisons among the other types is easy to follow, and linking expressions such as “In contrast,” “By comparison,” and “Meanwhile” help signal relationships between trends. The final paragraph also groups the one-person and lone-parent figures logically. Cohesion is generally flexible and clear, though the repeated use of “proportion” and “figure” makes some references less varied than they could be. You could improve precision by naming the category again where needed and by grouping the two rising categories more explicitly. Overall, the reader can follow the comparisons without difficulty.

Lexical Resource: Band 6.0

You use an adequate range of task-appropriate vocabulary, including “accounted for,” “declined considerably,” “fluctuated slightly,” “tripled,” and “remained unchanged.” These choices help describe trends and comparisons clearly. However, several spelling errors—such as “diffrent,” “Braitain,” “persentage,” and “incresed”—show that lexical control is not consistently accurate. Some category labels are also less precise or natural: “lone parants families” and “non dependent children” would be clearer with standard forms. Proofreading spelling and using the table’s labels consistently would strengthen accuracy. Continue building a range of precise trend language while ensuring that less familiar terms are correctly formed and spelled.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 6.5

You use a mix of simple and complex structures, including the overview contrast “although this figure declined considerably” and the comparison beginning “By comparison.” Most sentences communicate the data clearly, and the past-tense reporting is generally controlled. Some grammatical inaccuracies remain. For example, “In 1971, household with dependent children” needs a plural determiner or noun form, and “the proportion og lone parent families” contains an incorrect preposition-like form. The comma in “rose from 19% in 1971 to 25%, in 2001” is also misplaced. These errors do not prevent understanding, but careful checking of articles, plurals and punctuation would improve accuracy. More consistently accurate complex sentences would demonstrate stronger control.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.