Band 5.0 IELTS Writing Task 1 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.0 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-10-21

IELTS Writing Task 1 question

The table below shows the change in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

PEOPLE IN HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE OF HOUSEHOLD AND FAMILY

Student answer (Band 5.0)

The given table chart demonstrates the details about the variation in some households types in Great Britain during the span of 36 years. The units are measured in percentages.

At a glance, it can be witnessed that dependent children depicted the highest ration, where the lowest percentage was of lone parent in all years.

After analysing the chart, it can be clearly seen that around 6%of household was covered by one person in former year which increased from 6% to 12% in 2001 and it remained constant in 2007 at 12%. Furthermore, the percentages of lone parent was accounted for 4% in 1971 which rose up at 6% in 1981. Afterthat, it remained stable ar 12% in last two years.

Probing ahead to further details, non-depended started at 10% in 1971 and was constant in 1981. in 1991, it hit up 1 % in 1991. Following this, in final years it was untouched at 9%. Moreover, 52% was followed by dependent children in former, which declined in all years and lastly 36% in 2007. There was a difference of about 6% in terms of non children between 1971 and 2007, whereas the maximum ration was in 2007 with 25%.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 5.0

You identify several relevant trends, including the rise in one-person households and lone-parent households and the decline in households with dependent children. However, the overview is partly inaccurate: dependent children were the largest category throughout, but lone-parent households were not the smallest in every year, since one-person households were higher from 2001 onward. Some figures are also misreported or unclear: non-dependent children reached 11% in 1991, not 1%, and the final comparison about “non children” and a maximum of 25% does not clearly identify the no-children couple category. To strengthen the response, give a concise, accurate overview and compare the main categories using clearly labelled figures.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 5.0

The response has a basic sequence, moving from an introduction and overview to details about several household types. Paragraph breaks and signposting such as “Furthermore” and “Moreover” show an attempt to organise the information. However, progression is not consistently clear: “Probing ahead to further details” is followed by several categories in one paragraph, and the final comparison is difficult to connect to the preceding figures. Some linking phrases feel mechanical, while references such as “it” and “the former” do not always make the category or year clear. Group the categories into logical comparisons—for example, rising types and declining types—and use direct labels to make relationships easier to follow.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some task-related vocabulary, including “percentages,” “declined,” “remained constant,” and “rose,” so the reader can recognise the intended trends. However, the range is limited and several word choices or collocations are inaccurate enough to make parts difficult to interpret. Examples include “highest ration” for “highest proportion,” “hit up 1%,” and “non-depended,” which obscures the category being described. “The given table chart” is also an awkward description of the visual. Aim for precise, repeated category names and natural trend language rather than ornate phrases such as “Probing ahead.” Check spelling and word forms, especially for labels taken directly from the table.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and longer sentences, including clauses linked with “which” and “whereas,” but complex constructions are often faulty and errors occur frequently. For example, “the percentages of lone parent was accounted for 4%” has problems with agreement and sentence construction, while “one person in former year” lacks a clear grammatical reference. There are also inconsistent sentence starts and punctuation, as in “in 1991,” and missing spaces after figures. These errors sometimes make the intended meaning harder to follow. Practise accurate basic patterns first, such as “The proportion of one-person households rose from 6% to 12%,” then add subordinate clauses only when their grammar is secure.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.