Band 5.5 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 5.5 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-11-09

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Tourism is one of the fastest growing industries and contributes a great deal to economies around the world. However, the damage tourism can cause to local cultures and the environment is often ignored.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 5.5)

It is often argued that tourism, which is the fastest growing industry wheather contributes the world through increasing its economy or the damaged caused by it to local culture and environment outweights the benefits. In my opinion, benefits to the economy via tourism is more vital for the development of a country.

Though it is seen that, if tourists come to visit in abundent quantity, often the evvironment gets more polluted. As more people enters a country, more will be the air and water pollution. There will be more vehicles running on the road, emitting carbon dioxide and litter will be scattered here and there. Local cultures can be subsided and their business can run short as peole will concentrate more on the profit of tourism business.

However, tourism is a vital part for developing economy. More tourists means more money will be spend on the country. Furthemore, tourists will give reviews on various historical and popular palces of the country. This will help those places to be recognized worldwide. This will bring in more tourists and hence will contribute to raise a country's economical status. Tourists will also buy products and consume food from local shops, which will help flame businesses of the local people.

In conclusion, though there might be some hazards in upraising tourist businees, the recognition and worldide popularity it brings for the country is needed for the economy to boost. So, I think it is a positive sign to bring more tourists in the country and uprise the ecnomy.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you acknowledge environmental and cultural harm but argue that tourism’s economic contribution is more important. This addresses the question and gives relevant reasons, including pollution, pressure on local businesses, international recognition, and spending at local shops. However, the discussion is unevenly developed. The harms are listed briefly, while the economic case is explained in more detail; the claim that tourism is “needed for the economy to boost” would be stronger with a specific example or explanation of how income benefits residents. The opening also frames the issue somewhat unclearly. To strengthen the response, explain the extent of your agreement directly and develop both sides with more precise supporting examples.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The response has a clear overall structure: an introduction, a paragraph on negative effects, a contrasting paragraph on economic benefits, and a conclusion. The progression from “Though” to “However” makes the contrast easy to follow, and the conclusion returns to your position. This meets the lower-band expectation of coherent organisation and also shows some features of stronger cohesion. However, links between individual claims are sometimes abrupt: the move from pollution to local culture and business in the second paragraph needs clearer explanation. Phrases such as “This will help” and “This will bring in” also rely on broad references rather than specifying the cause or outcome. Use more precise transitions and connect each example explicitly to the paragraph’s main point.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.0

You use some topic-relevant vocabulary, including “air and water pollution,” “carbon dioxide,” “historical,” and “local shops,” so the main ideas are generally understandable. However, the range is limited and several noticeable spelling and word-choice errors reduce precision, such as “wheather,” “outweights,” “abundent,” and “palces.” Some combinations are also unnatural, including “flame businesses” and “economical status.” These errors can make the reader pause to interpret your meaning, which is consistent with this level. Build a more reliable set of collocations for tourism and economic impact, and proofread spelling carefully. Prefer precise expressions such as “support local businesses” and “economic growth” over improvised combinations.

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.0

You attempt both simple and complex sentence forms, including a relative clause in the opening and conditional phrasing such as “if tourists come to visit.” The paragraphing also gives you opportunities to express contrast and cause. However, complex structures are often not controlled accurately, and errors occur in agreement, verb forms, articles, and sentence construction. For example, “benefits … is more vital” has a subject–verb agreement problem, while “more people enters” and “more money will be spend” show errors in agreement and verb form. The opening sentence is difficult to follow because its clauses are not clearly connected. Practise checking the subject and verb in each clause, and use shorter, accurate sentences before adding more complex structures.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.