Band 6.0 IELTS Writing Task 2 Model Answer

Overall Band Score: 6.0 · IELTS Summit Mastery · 2026-11-11

IELTS Writing Task 2 question

Tourism is one of the fastest growing industries and contributes a great deal to economies around the world. However, the damage tourism can cause to local cultures and the environment is often ignored.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Student answer (Band 6.0)

In recent years,people have shown a great interest in travelling around the globe. Albeit,this increased attrcation helps rise the economy of a countrry but it brings some deterimental effects with it such as the cdestruction to the environment and negative influence on native hertitage of the host country,With all the benefits it offers , the negative aspect of tourism can not be neglected. Therefore, I largely aggree with the statement and will put my opinion followed by some suggestions in the essay.

I would argue that toursim industry helps people explore the world and contribute significantly to rise the finances of a country, yet the environment suffers.Tourism ruins the natural resources by overconsumption and careles attitues of people who tend to stay for a short period of time.People visiting from different parts of the world exploit the resources by either not taking care of it or tampering the uses.For instance, Camping activities affect the land and natural beauty of the area by liting fires at night and cooking.Afterwards visitors donot consifder themselves accountable for collecting thir wastes. As a result, the maintenanace of these places require some artificial replacements which takes away the natural essense of the place.

Additionaly, attempts of visitors to extend their period opf stay affects the local traditions and culture of countries.Many toursits after settling in a foreign country , instead of adopting to new cultures, try to stay connected to their routes which badly affects the norms and traditions of countries.Though, it helps to introduce some positive attributes too but it directly carries away the originality of that places.Hence, tourism damages the local specialities .

In conclusion, I would argue that the drawbacks that comes with tourism can not be ignored as it will defintily lead to long term losses.Governmsnts and responsible authoricites should consuider the economical benefits it brings but input considerable ammount of effort to regualte some laws specific to tourism.

AI examiner evaluation

Task Achievement / Task Response: Band 6.0

Your position is clear: you “largely agree” that tourism’s harms should not be ignored, and you address both environmental damage and effects on local culture. The camping example gives the environmental point some concrete support, while the discussion of visitors retaining their own customs is relevant to cultural change. However, the cultural argument is less fully explained: clarify how tourism itself changes local traditions, rather than focusing mainly on visitors’ behaviour. The introduction promises “some suggestions,” but the essay offers only a brief final recommendation about regulating tourism; develop this into a specific measure and explain how it would reduce harm. These uneven levels of development keep the response from fully extending all its relevant ideas.

Coherence and Cohesion: Band 6.5

The essay has a clear overall structure: an introduction states your view, two body paragraphs discuss environmental and cultural effects, and a conclusion restates your position. This logical arrangement makes the main line of argument easy to follow. You also use linking expressions such as “For instance,” “As a result,” and “In conclusion” to signal examples and stages in the argument. At times, however, connections are mechanical or unclear. For example, “Though, it helps to introduce some positive attributes too” does not clearly identify what “it” refers to, and the relationship between this concession and the claim that tourism carries away local originality needs explanation. Use more precise referencing and make transitions express the actual relationship between ideas.

Lexical Resource: Band 5.5

You attempt a range of topic-related vocabulary, including “overconsumption,” “natural resources,” “norms and traditions,” and “economical benefits.” These choices show an effort to discuss tourism’s effects beyond basic terms. However, inaccurate spelling and word choice are noticeable and sometimes make the reader pause: examples include “attrcation,” “deterimental,” “hertitage,” and “routes” where “roots” appears intended. Some combinations are also unnatural, such as “helps rise the economy” and “artificial replacements.” Aim for accurate, natural collocations and check spelling carefully, especially in key topic words. More precise phrasing would help you express the argument without relying on broad terms such as “negative aspect” and “specialities.”

Grammatical Range and Accuracy: Band 5.5

You use both simple statements and attempts at more complex sentences, including clauses introduced by “although” and “as a result.” This gives the essay some structural variety, and the main meaning is generally recoverable. Some grammatical errors remain, particularly in sentence boundaries, agreement, articles, and clause construction. For example, “the drawbacks that comes” should use a plural verb, and “the maintenance of these places require” has a subject–verb agreement problem. The opening also joins several ideas with commas, making the sentence difficult to control. Review punctuation and build complex sentences around one clear main clause; check agreement and article use when editing. These changes would make your varied structures more accurate and easier to read.

See this exact question answered at other band scores. The same prompt compared across bands.

Browse more IELTS Writing model answers or get your own writing scored by the same AI examiner.